Immaculate Deception Revised

I shall begin with the statement: as above, so below - there is nothing new under the sun. We know that the sun is our local star because the sun is the nearest star to our planet. When the star loses its shine, it crystallizes and then falls from grace and wanders around in space until it is caught up in the orbit of a bigger star with a more powerful gravitational pull. The falling star is the prodigal son/sun, the bigger star is the father, and the earth is the mother (i.e., mother earth - a crystallized sun). Stars have been important to civilizations throughout the world and it is a well-known fact that the natural genesis of our religious practices today lies in the worship of the closest star to us, the sun.

For thousands of years, humans, in their appreciation of the solar power of the sun, made Amen-Ra (i.e., the sun) their greatest god. All of life was a thanksgiving to Amen, and a preparation to enter the spiritual world after death. They lived a life in harmony with the cycles of nature and divided their spiritual age according to the sun movement at the vernal equinox. The ancients were unequivocally monotheistic; however, their spiritual practices manifested externally in a symbolic polytheism. In other words, Aten (i.e., Aton/Atum/Atom/JHVN/Jehova) was always seen as the absolute one, but its divine essence was believed to manifest within each human being. The religious cultists, in their ignorance of the wisdom of the ancients, anthropomorphized the absolute one (i.e., aten) into a savior they could picture outside of themselves. This, I contend, was the first betrayal and the beginning of immaculate deception.

The architect of the first betrayal, as recorded in history, was Amenhotep IV, famously known as Akhenaton. Akhenaton became the sole ruler of Kemet shortly after the death of his father, Amenhotep III. No sooner had he stepped on the throne than he changed his name from Amenhotep IV to Akhenaton, a clear violation of spiritual tradition. He went as far as closing down the Amen temples and changing the name of all the gods to Aten. In other words, he made Aten the exclusive monotheistic god of the land. This controversial departure from the traditional worship of Amen made Akhenaton very unpopular. The powerful Amen priests and other Amen cultists vehemently and violently protested Akhenaton’s decision. To prevent all out civil war, Akhenaton stepped down and his son, Tutankhaten (popularly known as king Tut, the child king) assumed the throne. King Tut (Akhenaton’s son) did not rule for long before he was assassinated by the Amen priests. Every attempt by Akhenaton, with the help of his  supporters, to reclaim the throne proved futile. He fled with his army of supporters into exile around 1335 BCE. While in exile, possibly living amongst his mother’s clan, Akhenaton continued his campaign of monotheistic Aten, which would later evolve into Judaism. History teaches us that, Akhenaton’s mom, queen Tiye was not originally from Kemet, but married into the royal family of Kemet (kmt). Queen Tiye’s  husband was Amenhotep III, Akhenaton’s father.

Many scholars, some of them Jewish, had concluded that the biblical story of Exodus was a dramatized distortion of the historical fight that broke out in Kemet between the “Amenists” and the “Atenists”, which led to the eventual migration of Akhenaton and his army of Atenists out of Kemet. In other words, historically, the story of Exodus as dramatized in the Bible never happened, the biblical Hebrew people were never enslaved in Kemet and biblical Moses was actually Akhenaton, a pharaoh. Sigmund Freud, the one they call the father of psychoanalysis, stated in his book (Moses and Monotheism) that the origin of monotheism could be traced back to the worship of Aten in Kemet and that Moses, whose real name “Moshe” is clearly Egyptian, was indeed an Egyptian. Another Scholar of Jewish extraction, Sholom sand, a professor of history at Tel Aviv University, argued in his controversial book (the invention of Jewish people) that the Palestinians of today had a closer lineage to the ancient Hebrew than the Jewish people of today. He affirmed that the Palestinian Muslims of today were the original descendants of a group of people who were the first converts to Judaism. However, in the Piscean age of Christianity, he stated that these early Jewish converts were forced by the Romans to convert into Christianity and much later into Islam, after the Islamists took over Palestine. Islam, he claimed, the ancient Palestinians found more appealing than Christianity because of its similarity to their original Hebrew faith (Judaism). Dr. Walter Williams made it convincingly clear in his book, historical origin of christianity, that none of the biblical characters (i.e., both old and new testaments) ever existed. He challenged the reader to rethink the previously held supposition concerning the existence of ancient Hebrew people because no such people ever existed in antiquity. He opined that the new testament was written before the old testament and that Judaism was not a B.C religion. Lastly, David S. Sperling, a professor of Bible at Hebrew Union College concluded in his book, The Original Torah, that the tales of the Torah were originally composed as allegories whose purpose was distinctly and intentionally political.

The current writer goes even further to state that most of the stories dramatized in the Torah or the Old Testament were deliberate distortions of common stories and historical events in kemet. For example, the stories of David and Goliath, Adam and Eve and Cain and Abel are obvious replica of the Osirian drama as recited in the Memphite theology. Further still, most of the glorious Hebrew kings (David, Solomon etc.) described in the Torah were actually Kemetic Pharaohs who ruled over much of that region at that time. In fact, most wars the Israelites claimed they won in the bible, they lost. And most of the lands they claimed they conquered were ruled over, one time or another, by the Kemites. This explains why ancient temples, palaces, monuments of biblical proportions are found in Egypt today and none of import has ever been found in Palestine/Israel in spite of the Israeli government commitment to dig for archeological evidence to corroborate the biblical stories. It is one thing to put fancy and glorious stories in your book(s), and it is another thing to back them up with linguistic, archeological and historical evidence. The historical and archeological evidence we have before us today provide support neither for the ancient Isreal origin nor for the five books of Moses. For example, the body of the pharaoh that was claimed to have perished in the Nile river while chasing the Isrealites out of Egypt can be viewed today in its mummified form at the Cairo museum. The pharaoh's name is Ramesses!

The question now is that if the ancient Hebrew were never enslaved in Kemet and if Exodus never happened as depicted in the Bible, why then did the Jewish scribes disparage the Kemites as they did in the Torah. The answer reveals itself when you understand that the tales of the Torah were originally composed as allegories whose purpose was distinctly and intentionally political.

There have been many Christ in history and almost all of them tried to reconcile the monotheistic principle of Aten with the misunderstood cult of Amen. The anointed ones (Christ), unlike the ignorant masses, understood that esoterically the cult of Amen and Aten were synonymous spiritual principles. They preached everywhere they went that man was a microcosm of a macrocosm - while Aten, the absolute one could be a savior outside oneself, the savior could also be within oneself. We know that the anointed ones were unpopular for their preaching and were often crucified.  If you are the kind that is stuck on the color and race of Christ; well, historically Christ had been depicted in different colors and races. For example, there was Heru (Horus), the first mythological Christ, the son of Ausar (the Kemetic god of the underworld). There was Krishna, the mythological Christ of India. There was Serapis Soter, the historical Christ of Ptolemaic-Greco reign in Kemet. There was Yhesua Ben Pandira (Son of Ra), another historical Christ of Greco-Roman reign in Kemet. Lastly, there was Apollonius of Tyana another historical Christ of Greco-Roman reign in Kemet, the father of uber spiritual Essene group in Jerusalem and the supposed writer of the biblical revelation. So there you have it, you can even be Christ if you want. It is not implausible that Serapis Soter is the Christ depicted in the bible today, but the personality and the history infused into this Christ may have been that of Heru (Horus the junior), Tutankhaten (king Tut), Yhesua Ben Pandira, and Apollonius of Tyana. For example, Heru was said to be the son of god, who resurrected as his father, and on judgement day led the soul of the dead to his father after the soul had been weighed against the feather of truth (Maat). Similarly, Jesus the Christ is said to be the son of god, who resurrected after death, and through whom one can reach the father or the father’s kingdom.


Peasants, in their ignorance, see the Christ as the son of God and argue over his color and race. However, men of wisdom know without a doubt that the real Christ is the sun, who dies for us every night in the West, but resurrects for us to live every morning in the East. While Christianity, as a spiritual philosophy in its original form was beautifully conceived in the minds of the Kemites and Hindustans (Hindu-Cush mystery system), the Roman Emperor Constantine turned this beautiful concept into a dogma and political instrument. We learned that Constantine converted the Roman Empire into Christianity when he realized that Christians made excellent soldiers – you tell them they have a special place in heaven and they will fight to death for a cause that is even against their own interest. Mohammedanism sprang up to rectify Constantine’s deception, but it also fell into the dogma of Islam. Today, the two dogmas are in constant battle over supremacy.

In the struggle between the cult of Amen and the cult of Aten, the Atenists won but the Amenists did not really lose because every Atenist still ends his/her prayer with a "shout out" to the sun god, Amen. I hope that in this new age of Aquarius, the civilized humanity would once and for all wake up to the fact that primitive theologies had been deliberately distorted and we have been immaculately deceived.

 Hints, clues and questions
(1) Judeo-Christian Abraham= Islamic Ibrahim = Hindu Brahma.
Brahma was said to have a wife named Saraswati, and Abraham was said to have a wife named Sarah - coincidence? Hinduism preceded Judaism by thousands of years.
(2) Who is Rahman? Did he get demoted to Ramadan?
(3) What connection does El-at or Al-lat have with the moon goddess and Allah?
(4) Did Mohammed ever exist?
(5) What do Kaaba and Kabalah mean?
(6) Was Akhenaton the original writer of the songs of David (i.e., Psalms)?
(7) Did Solomon and Abraham ever exist?
(8) Did Akhenaton destroy Kemetic philosophy and thus Kemet?
(9) Any connection between Kemetic mystery system and Hinduism?
(10) Why did the Semites detest the Kemites – going by what’s written in the Talmud and Hadith about Ham?
(11) Who were the Moors and what was their role in antiquity?
(12) What was the rivalry between the Umayyad and the Abbasid Caliphates or the Sunnis and Shites?
(13) Who is an Arab, or better yet, who is a Semite?
(14) What is the difference between Mohammedanism and Islam, which one came first?
(15) Are the Arabs really in control of Islam Today? If not, who are?
(16) Did the Moors ever come into contact with the Templars?
(17) Does Saturn have any connection with Satan?
(18) What was Rushdie telling us in the “satanic verses” and why was he being haunted by Fatwa?
(19) What is the significance of March the 21st?
(20) Why is January now the first month of the year?
(21) Who changed the Calendar and why?
(22) Do we really know what time it is?
(23) Did Yahweh have a female companion?