I maintain that around 2,300 years ago (300 BC), the Ptolemy rulers of Hellenistic Egypt used an advanced pseudepigraphical method to compile the Septuagint, now called the Pentateuch. The Romans after them used the same method to compile the Novum Testamentum. Contrary to what we've been sold by the mainstream historians that the Septuagint is a translation of the Hebrew Pentateuch to Greek, conscientious scholars contend that the Septuagint is a translation of the Ancient Egyptian texts to Greek, not Hebrew texts to Greek as now implied. The mainstream historians' claim is premised largely on Flavius Josephus's (acclaimed 1st Century Jewish historian) historical accounts, but the conscientious scholars have proven beyond reasonable doubt that Flavius Josephus was a "pseudepigraphical personage" invented to further buttress the prenteded antiquity of the Pentateuch and the Hebrew antecedents.
I consider this ancient cover-up to have been the reason why the library of Alexandria was burnt down to destroy the evidence. I further consider this as to be the reason why the Kemetic bloodline is denigrated in the Pentateuch, and the Abrahamic bloodline elevated; even though, the Abrahamic bloodline and the authorship attributed to it are pseudepigraphical (I.e. false). Lastly, I consider this as to be the reason why the Egyptologists and others would never concede Kemet as part of the greater Nile Valley African Civilizations - this is anti-Kemetism.
If you study Kemet and learn what happened out there during the Hellenistic reign of the Ptolemies, I promise, the present paradigm will make more sense to you.
Their power is tied only to your ignorance. Wake up!
