The Game Changers

There're two inventions that shaped the nature of reality as we perceive it today. One was the invention of the printing press around 1445AD - 1450 AD, and the other was the invention of the gun powder around 13th - 14th Century AD. 

Prior to these two inventions, in spite of what you might have read in the so-called history books, almost all the nations of the world were relatively on the same level of development - there were strong and weak Asian states; strong and weak African states; strong and weak European states; and strong and weak native American states. Not one nation was significantly more developed than others.

However, there was a paradim shift in reality, and a dramatic change in the world order shortly after the invention of the printing press and the gun powder. It was at this time that all the academic subjects, including history, philosophy, and religious studies, and all books, including the Bible, the Torah and the Quran were formulated and developed. There were probably some ancient scrolls floating around in the Egyptian, Indian, native American, and other temples around world, but they were all compiled and published into books after the invention of the printing press in Europe.

This is why I said in my short essay (I.e. "History is written in the Present"),

that ancient men neither wrote nor chronicled their own histories. It's the modern men, who, after the invention of the printing press, created all sorts of paper histories and historical chronologies. And it was the modern men who attempted to compress the records of every ancient classical civilization into the 6000-year-old-ecclesiastical chronology they, themselves, invented.

This invented or falsified ecclesiastical chronology came to be accepted as reality today through the power of the gun powder. In other words, the printing press was used to print books that were formulated on the invented chronology, while the gun powder was used to force people to embrace them.

You can't really force people to embrace a book today, well in the West, but many people have been conditioned to accept the invented ecclesiastical chronology as reality.

An excerpt from Manly P. Hall’s "The Occult Anatomy of Man."

All the priests of the ancient world were anatomists. They recognized that all the functions of nature were reproduced in miniature in the human body. They therefore used man as the textbook, teaching their disciples that to understand man was to understand the universe. These wise men believed that every star in the heavens, every element in the earth, and every function in nature, was represented by a corresponding center, pole, or activity within the human body.

These wise ones realized that there was a great deal more involved in religion than the chanting of mantras and the singing of hymns; they realized that the path of salvation could be walked successfully only by those who have practical, scientific knowledge of the occult function of their own bodies. The anatomical symbolism which they evolved in order to perpetuate this understanding has come down to modern Christianity, but the keys to it apparently have been lost. It is a tragic situation for religionists that they are surrounded by hundreds of symbols which they cannot understand, but it is still sadder than they have even forgotten that these symbols ever had any meaning other than the foolish interpretations which they themselves have concocted.

The idea prevalent in the minds of Christians that their faith is the one and only truly inspired doctrine, and that it came parentless into the world, is unreasonable in the extreme. A study of comparative religions proves beyond doubt that Christianity has begged, borrowed, or stolen its philosophies and concepts from the religions and philosophies of the ancient and medieval pagan worlds. Among the religious symbols and allegories which belonged to the world long ago before the coming of Christianity are a few to which we would like to call your attention. The following Christian symbols and concepts are of pagan origin:

The Christian cross, comes from Egypt and India; the triple miter from the faith of the Mithraics; the shepherd’s crook from the Hermetic Mysteries and Greece; the immaculate conception from India; the transfiguration from Persia; and the trinity from the Brahmans. The Virgin Mary, as the mother of God, is found in a dozen different faiths. There are over twenty crucified world saviors. The church steeple is an adaption of Egyptian obelisks and pyramids, while the Christian devil is the Egyptian Typhon with certain modifications. The deeper one goes into the problem, the more he realizes there is nothing new under the sun. A truly sincere study of the Christian faith proves beyond all doubt that it is the evolutionary outgrowth of primitive doctrines. There is an evolution in religion as well as in physical form. If we accept and incorporate into our doctrines the religious symbolism of nearly forty peoples it behooves us to understand (at least in part) the meaning of myths and allegories which we borrow, lest we be more ignorant than those from whom we secured them.

This brochure is devoted to the problem of explaining the relationship existing between the symbolism of the ancient priests and the occult functions of the human body. We must first understand that all scared writings are supposed to be sealed with seven seals. In other words, it requires seven complete interpretations to understand fully the meaning of these ancient philosophic revelations which we have liked to call Holy Writ. Scripture is not intended to be historical. Those who understand its literal meaning understand the least of its meaning.

THE FALLACY OF PERFECTION

Have you ever noticed that the same people who subscribe to the concept of "universal truth" almost always subscribe to the idea of "perfection?" Their line of reasoning goes something like this: if over a billion people accept a concept, never mind how the concept came to be accepted,  then that concept must universally true, and thus perfect.

I know what you're thinking. "Oh, he's probably talking about religious people (I.e. Christians and Muslims)." Well, the truth is I am, but I'm also talking about non-religious humanists who subscribe to the same delusion of perfection as religionists.

As far as I'm concerned, the concept of universal truth or perfection, be it religious or non-religious, is illogical and fallacious. Same fallacy but different groups! Now, let's examine each group.

The Muslims and their estranged-Christian cousins would tell you to subscribe to their respectful spiritual concepts just because their doctrines are premised on universal truth and divine perfection. They're quick to point to the popular acceptance of their doctrines, billions of adherents and counting, as a testament to the universal truth embedded in their doctrines. Never mind, no where on this planet, truth has ever been established based on the popular acceptance of a concept. 

Well, since religious folks don't dwell much on logic. It behooves me to impress logic on them. If a concept is divinely perfect and universally true, no one would deny its validity. That is, if Christianity is the universal way to "divine truth;" then by default, there would never be Muslims, and vice versa. For example, the SUN is universally true in that it shines. This is why there's no Christian sun, Muslim sun, agnostic sun or even atheist sun. There is only one SUN that rises in the East and sets in the West, and the cosmic truth is that the sun would shine on you with or without your acceptance.

Anyway, the idea of "divine perfection" is even more bizarre than the conceptual idea of "universal truth." For the umpteenth time, there is no such thing as perfection in the Cosmos. The Cosmos operates on a strict "cosmic order" and balance (I.e. MAAT). On this planet, reality is based on relative perception or relativism (I.e. relative balance between opposites), but not on absolute perfection.

The non-religious humanists are just as fallacious in their thinking of the concept of "perfection" and "universal truth" as the religionists; though, in a different way. The humanists, unlike the religionists, believe nature is perfect. According to them, if nature is perfect and if Darwinian Evolution is a natural process, then everything must be evolving towards "perfection" and Darwin's Theory of Evolution must be universally true - this is a fallacious piece of reasoning.

First off, I subscribe to the theory of evolution, but the evolutionary process is not a perfecting process. Every evolutionary process is a binary-mutation process (I.e. positive mutation and negative mutation). Whatever you think you gain in the evolutionary process, you also lose something else of equal magnitude, balancing out the net outcome. In other words, evolution is a balancing process not a perfecting process. As evolved and prefect as we think we are, if the bees were extinct, we'd probably be extinct as well - we must not be too perfect if our existence is predicated on that of bees. Well, cosmic order and balance make it so!

Great thinkers overstand the cosmic principle of order and balance (I.e. MAAT), and that's why they don't conceptualize or waste time with the idea of  "perfection." They only conceptualize optimization and spend time on finding the optimal points not the perfect points. 

For example, Modigliani and Miller conceptualized and proved an optimum Capital Asset Equilibrium Price not a "perfect" Capital Asset Equilibrium Price. In Game theory, John Nash wasn't looking for the perfect payouts but optimal payouts (i.e. Nash Equilibrium). In the Monte-Carlo method, analysts never look for perfect models but optimal models.

In conclusion, perfection is not part of human reality; order and balance (I.e. MAAT) are. So, if you're constantly searching for perfection in anything, you're simply searching for something that's not there. Search for MAAT (order and balance) not perfection!

SCALIGERIAN CHRONOLOGY

The chronology of the entire history of almost all the classical civilizations was developed by a man named Joseph Justus Scalinger. Joseph Justus Scaliger (Circa 1540 – 1609 AD) was a French philologist and historian whose works on chronology (i.e. SCALIGERIAN CHRONOLOGY) were among the greatest contributions of Renaissance scholars in historical and classical studies (source: Encyclopedia Britannica).

In his work, Scalinger investigated ancient systems of determining epochs, calendars and computations of time. Scalinger had a number of students, but his most famous student was Dionysius Petavius or Dionysius the little (a.k.a Dionysius the Petit in French or Exiguus in Latin).

Dionysius Petavius (Circa 1583 – 1652 AD) was a Scaligerian-Jesuit chronologist, best known as the inventor of the B.C/A.D dating system, which is adapted to number the years in the Gregorian calendar that we use in the West and other parts of the world today –  as you may already know, B.C stands for Before Christ and A.D stands for Anno Domini “in the year of our Lord.”

It’s important to know that it was Dionysius Petavius, who, based on the Scaligerian-Biblical chronology that he single-handedly developed, calculated the earth’s age to be 6000 years old – see Anno Mundi. While scientists have proven that our planet is so much older than 6000 years, perhaps billions of years old, the historical chronology of all the classical civilizations, from Ancient Egypt to the Ottoman Empire, is still being compressed into the falsified-earth’s-age timeframe of 6000 years.

In other words, much of the history of the world as we know it today was formulated based on a falsified-Scaligerian-biblical chronology. According to Fomenko and Nosovskiy, in their book “History: fiction or science,” the entire history of the Holy Roman Empire was back-dated or shifted-back by at least 1050 years, and much of this history happened during the Middle Ages (1000 - 1500 AD) not during the 1st Century through the 12th Century AD as now implied. Other scholars, like Walter Williams and Godfrey Higgins, had made similar claims.

I’ve always known that the biblical writers engaged in a premeditated falsification of history, involving the superimposition of created biblical characters and biblical chronology on real-historical characters and chronology. However, I was neither aware of the scale of this falsification as revealed in my latest research, nor of its agenda.

ALL HISTORY IS WRITTEN IN THE PRESENT

If human knowledge is derived from experience and observation; then, it's safe to conclude that history and truth are established now, in the present, not in the past. In other words, it's in the present that we think and write about the past, and it's in the present that we make predictions about the future.

The history of every "ancient civilization" was formulated and chronicled very recently by modern men - not one "ancient man" wrote about his own history, and not one "ancient civilization" found the need to chronicle its own civilization.

Yes, there're larger than life ancient ruins all over the river valleys of the world, but none specified a time period and none chronicled a specific history. It's the modern men who read dates into the ancient records and ruins. It's the modern men who created a paper history (i.e. the history of a people with no known ancient records of their own), and turned it into a paper religion.

Paper histories and paper religions; simply put, holy lies came to be accepted as the truth right after the invention of the printing press and gun powder. The printing press was used to print the holy lies en masse, and the gun powder was used to force people to accept the holy lies. Many resisted, but they were all brutally persecuted. Anyway, that marked the beginning of the history of the world as we know it today - humanity was changed forever.

You're born free ladies and gentlemen. The original sin is ignorance, and the only hell is one created by the merchants of fear. Free your self from their holy lies; live your life, and write your own history. Every history is made and written now, in the present!