IS HUMAN EVOLUTION A PERFECTING PROCESS?

The idea that human evolution is a perfecting process is ludicrous.

First off, man cannot evolve outside of the information or instructions 

he receives from his environment. And since environmental instructions 

are not perfect, evolution cannot be a perfecting process.

Secondly, every forward evolutionary step is coupled with a backward

devolutionary step. In other words, evolution and devolution are mutually 

exclusive. I shall illustrate my logic using the genetic disorder of sickle-cell 

anemia. 

The genetic signature of many people in the tropics had changed or 

mutated over time to develop a natural-defense-mechanism to malaria. 

This mutated gene forces the regular disc-like shape of the red blood 

cell to be sickle, an evolutionary feature that allows tropical people to 

withstand deadly malaria-fever. I must mention that human genetic 

signature is a binary signature. That is, when one side of the signature 

changes to accommodate a new set of environmental instructions, the 

other side devolves to compensate for this change. So, while sickle-cell 

signature is a natural shield against deadly malaria fever, its complementary

or  "trade-off" pair is actually destructive to the flow of oxygenated blood 

in the human body.  Similar trade-offs can be seen in people who suffer 

from Alzheimer, Autism, hypovitaminosis D etc. For example, Alzheimer and 

Autism are reverse compensations for the complexity of the human brain 

power, and hypovitaminosis D is a reverse compensation for hyper-melanization.

Let me now tie my reasoning above to the issue of genetically modified

foods (GMO). Many people are worried sick that the current surge in

the consumption of GMO foods would be harmful to human health. Yes,

the consumption of GMO foods would be destructive to the human body in

the short run; because, the GMO foods would introduce new or un-recognized 

set of instructions into the human cells. But in the long run, as the human body 

gets used to these GMO induced instructions, at least one human genetic 

signature would change or mutate to neutralize the adverse effect of GMO diets 

on the body. So, this dramatic change in human genetic signature is what many 

people call evolution. Again, since evolution and devolution are mutually 

exclusive. The moment at least one genetic signature evolves or changes to 

neutralize the adverse effect of the GMO diets, another genetic signature 

devolves or mutates to replace the evolved genetic signature.

In conclusion, evolution is a gradual change in the genetic structure of 

the biological populations due to a change in the environmental instruction 

or information. And since environmental instructions are not perfect; then, 

evolution cannot be a perfecting process.

RASTAS AND THE FABLE OF SOLOMON AND SHEBA

Saitic Isis and her young sun, Heru.

The words "Ras" and "Jah" connote light, wisdom or knowledge. When the Rastas chant "Jah Rastafari," they're essentially reaching for light, wisdom or knowledge. However, when they hail Selassie as a divine king due to his so-called "Solomonic antecedent" through the royal lineage of Sheba or Saba; it's clear they're attempting to reach for the ancient-Hebrew mythos!

The word "Saba," as the word "Ras" or "Jah," connotes light, wisdom or knowledge - Saba in Coptic means knowledge.That is, the mythical Queen of Sheba or Saba was the Queen of light or knowledge whom, I believe, symbolically represents Saitic Isis.

So if the Queen of Saba is the Queen of knowledge; then, it makes sense that King Solomon is the King of Wisdom or the King of light! It's often said that Solomon is the shekina or visible manifestation of divine wisdom. That is to say, Solomon, like Osir, personifies the sun. This is why the name "SOL!OM!ON" is the name of the sun in three different ancient languages, and why King Solomon is often associated with wisdom - light or enlightenment brings knowledge and wisdom.

I maintain that the Temple of Solomon was the Temple of Ausar or the Temple of the SUN; it had nothing to do with the pretended antiquity of Jerusalem and the Hebrew sect.

I further maintain that the mythical relationship between the Queen of Sheba and Solomon is an allegory for the astronomical relationship between the moon (Saitic Isis) and the sun (Ausar or Osir).

References: 

"Anacalypsis" by Godfrey Higgins 

"Natural genesis" by Gerald Massey

"Isis Unveiled" by P. Blavatsky 

Also see: http://ajendu.blogspot.com/2013/12/an-inquiry-into-sacred-relationship.html

Arabic Script and its Independent Evolution from Islam

I once mentioned that the development of Arabic as a writing script had 

very little, if anything, to do with the evolution of Islam. First off, every 

well-known writing script today came from a common origin. This simply 

means a writing script is a system, and just like every other system can 

only be invented once.

According to the most credible historical records available to us, every
well-known writing script of today originated from the ancient Egyptian 

scripts: the Pictographic Hieroglyphs or Md Ntr, the Phonetic I alphabets 

or Heratic script, and the Phonetic II alphabets or the Demotic script - it's 

even plausible that the ancient Egyptian scripts were derived from distant 

pre-historic antecedents. Even Plato had this to say in his work "The Republic," 

and I paraphrase: of all the the known inventions of the Ethiops, writing was 

probably the most important. Of course in antiquity, the Axumites, Nubians, and 

the Egyptians were collectively referred to as Ethiopians, all from Cusha Dwipa 

without.

Arabic, and perhaps even Hebrew, as writing scripts came out of the

Phonetic II alphabets or the Demotic script of ancient Egypt, which in its 

original form was essentially the Kufic or meroitic script of ancient Sudan. 

Again, the development of Arabic as a writing script has nothing to do with 

the evolution of Islam.

When I re-examined the sequential order of the evolution of writing
itself, contrary to the general assumption, it occurred to me that the 

invention of Phonetic alphabets might be anterior to the invention of 

Pictographic Hieroglyphs or Md Ntr. That is to say, it's plausible that the 

Phonetic alphabets were invented by the priest-class thousands of years 

before the development of the Pictographic Hieroglyphs or Md Ntr. 

But for simplicity, the priests endeavored to invent the Pictographic 

Hieroglyphs for the unlearned masses. Think about it! It is much easier to 

use symbols and Pictographs to transliterate ideas than to use alphabets.

This I consider as to be the reason why Pictographic Hieroglyphs were 

ubiquitous in Ancient Egypt, and why Phonetic alphabets were only used 

on papyri for recording scientific knowledge.

In other words, my contention is that the Phonetic alphabets were first among

the writing scripts to be invented by the priests, perhaps, to record their mystery 

knowledge; while, the Pictographic Hieroglyphs were developed much later to 

convey this knowledge in a simplistic way to the masses - the Rosetta stone was 

probably built for this purpose.

All in all, the fact that Arabic is found in some ancient texts for recording 

scientific knowledge does not mean that the author(s) of these texts were 

Muslims or even Arabs. It just means that Arabic was a preferred script at 

that time. We've seen Pre-Islamic-Egyptian medical papyri with what looks 

like the Arabic script, and we've also seen Christian texts that were written, 

mostly, in Arabic. So contrary to the general assumption, Arabic and Islam 

are not synonymous!

References:

Molefi, Asante: “African Intellectual Heritage – a book of sources.” (1996)

Anta, Diop: “Civilization or Barbarism.” (1991)

Martin Bernal: “Black Athena – vol I.” (1987)

Walter, Williams: “The Historical Origin of Islam.” (2001)

http://ajendu.blogspot.com/2013/03/on-origin-of-writing-scripts.html?m=1

http://ajendu.blogspot.com/2013/02/arabic-as-afro-asiatic-language-myth-or.html?m=1