Before you turn Egyptology into science and Egyptologists into gods, I think it'll suffice for you to understand the following:
1. Egyptology's modern history begins with the invasion of Egypt by Napoleon and with the discovery of Rosetta Stone in Egypt.
2. In the late 1800s, Egyptology became an academic subject through the research of Hienrich Brugsch et al.
3. In the 1920s, Egyptology became a legitimate academic field when James Henry Breasted founded the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago.
The question is, where did J.H Breasted get the funding for the establishment of the Oriental Institute from? The funds came from a wealthy Christian Evangelical, John D. Rockefeller (Rockefeller hereinafter). In other words, in an attempt to historicize the bible using a legitimate academic discipline (I.e. Archeology cum Egyptology), Rockefeller bankrolled the establishment of the Oriental Institute at the University of Chicago.
What's the hidden agenda here?
To understand the hidden agenda behind the establishment of the Oriental Institute and Egyptology, as a legitimate academic discipline, one must first understand:
1. The ancient Egyptians did not write their own history nor did they write their own historical chronology.
2. The history and historical chronology of Ancient Egypt were developed, around 1800s-1900s, by the Scaligerites and Jesuit scholars using the 6000-year biblical timeline that Joseph Scalinger and Petavius created.
Well, it's one thing to fabricate a timeline, history and historical chronology; it's another thing to have archeological records to back them up. Consequently, to back up the fabricated biblical timeline and chronology with verifiable archeological records, in and around Egypt, the Oriental Institute and the academic field of Egyptology were created.
In conclusion, Egyptology is not science. It's an agenda based academic field that's developed to historicize the bible. So, I would advise you to take it with a grain of salt.
Tuesday, August 16, 2016
Hebrew is Greek
In his very rare book, " Hebrew is Greek," Joseph Yahuda proved beyond a reasonable doubt that the so-called Hebrew script is actually Greek. While we must commend Mr. Yahuda for his excellent research, I must say, Mr. Yahuda's thesis is nothing new. It's old and well-known among the new chronologists and other diligent students of history that, there was no ancient Hebrew civilization in North East Africa (now Palestine).
What else do we know?
We know that the first two Bibles: Codex SINAITICUS and the SEPTUAGINT were both written in Koine Greek and not in Hebrew as now implied. The question is: if Hebrew was indeed an ancient script, why then did the Hebrews write their "Holy" book in Greek and not in Hebrew? To answer this important question, I must first deconstruction the myth of Ancient Greece.
It suffices to know that neither Ancient Hebrew civilization nor Ancient Greek civilization ever existed. Don't get me wrong, there were Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations of Ancient Crete and Athens respectively, but there was no Ancient Greek civilization as implied in traditional history. In other words, Ancient Hebrew and Ancient Greek civilizations were both fabricated. In fact, Ancient Greek civilization was fabricated as an academic duplicate of the Biblical Hebrew civilization. Permit me to demystify this riddle of fabrication!
The first history book (not the first book), ever written, on this planet, was the Bible, and it was written in Greek. It was a book about a creature, IESUS XPICTOC or Jesus the Christ, and his line of descent - Note I = 1; X = 10, the beginning and the end or Alpha and the Omega! The book was formulated and chronicled in the third Rome (i.e. Vatican City) by Joseph Justus Scalinger (Aka PAUL, aka JOSEPHUS). And in fact, it was the Biblical chronology that Scalinger used to develop the history of all the Ancient civilizations, from Ancient Egypt to Ancient China.
So, back to my previous question: "if Hebrew was indeed an ancient script, why then did the Hebrew write their "Holy" book in Greek and not in Hebrew?" The answer is: there was no Ancient Hebrew civilization, nor was there an Ancient Hebrew tribe. It was Joseph Scalinger and other Jesuit scholars who wrote, in Greek, the Biblical history of the Hebrew. And it was they who created Ancient Greek civilization as an academic duplicate of Ancient Hebrew civilization, for it would be senseless to promote the pretended antiquity of the Hebrew tribe when their book was written in Greek. Consequently, Ancient Greece had to be created, as a B.C era civilization, to explain away the mystery of why the first Bible was written in Greek and not in Hebrew.
In conclusion, while Greek civilization did exist in the Middle Ages before it was swallowed up by the Ottoman Empire, there was never an Ancient Hebrew civilization. The so-called Hebrew language that's widely spoken by the Ashkenazis of Israel, today, is actually Yiddish (a Turkic language); a language that's transcribed with Greek script (misnomer Hebrew).
The world is a matrix of lies!!!
What else do we know?
We know that the first two Bibles: Codex SINAITICUS and the SEPTUAGINT were both written in Koine Greek and not in Hebrew as now implied. The question is: if Hebrew was indeed an ancient script, why then did the Hebrews write their "Holy" book in Greek and not in Hebrew? To answer this important question, I must first deconstruction the myth of Ancient Greece.
It suffices to know that neither Ancient Hebrew civilization nor Ancient Greek civilization ever existed. Don't get me wrong, there were Minoan and Mycenaean civilizations of Ancient Crete and Athens respectively, but there was no Ancient Greek civilization as implied in traditional history. In other words, Ancient Hebrew and Ancient Greek civilizations were both fabricated. In fact, Ancient Greek civilization was fabricated as an academic duplicate of the Biblical Hebrew civilization. Permit me to demystify this riddle of fabrication!
The first history book (not the first book), ever written, on this planet, was the Bible, and it was written in Greek. It was a book about a creature, IESUS XPICTOC or Jesus the Christ, and his line of descent - Note I = 1; X = 10, the beginning and the end or Alpha and the Omega! The book was formulated and chronicled in the third Rome (i.e. Vatican City) by Joseph Justus Scalinger (Aka PAUL, aka JOSEPHUS). And in fact, it was the Biblical chronology that Scalinger used to develop the history of all the Ancient civilizations, from Ancient Egypt to Ancient China.
So, back to my previous question: "if Hebrew was indeed an ancient script, why then did the Hebrew write their "Holy" book in Greek and not in Hebrew?" The answer is: there was no Ancient Hebrew civilization, nor was there an Ancient Hebrew tribe. It was Joseph Scalinger and other Jesuit scholars who wrote, in Greek, the Biblical history of the Hebrew. And it was they who created Ancient Greek civilization as an academic duplicate of Ancient Hebrew civilization, for it would be senseless to promote the pretended antiquity of the Hebrew tribe when their book was written in Greek. Consequently, Ancient Greece had to be created, as a B.C era civilization, to explain away the mystery of why the first Bible was written in Greek and not in Hebrew.
In conclusion, while Greek civilization did exist in the Middle Ages before it was swallowed up by the Ottoman Empire, there was never an Ancient Hebrew civilization. The so-called Hebrew language that's widely spoken by the Ashkenazis of Israel, today, is actually Yiddish (a Turkic language); a language that's transcribed with Greek script (misnomer Hebrew).
The world is a matrix of lies!!!
The Three Roman Civilizations
In his book, "Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended," Isaac Newton applied his unique knowledge of physics and astronomy to problems of history, theology and mythology. Newton's radical ideas generated an uproar that reverberated across Europe in the 18th century and beyond.
What can we deduce from Newton's research?
1. The Western civilization is a Christian civilization by all standards.
2. The star catalog of Ptolemy Almagest which Joseph Scalinger used to formulate the chronology of Ancient civilizations might have been altered, deliberately, by the Church of Rome.
3. The Greco-Roman history was backdated by at least 500 years.
Using modern knowledge of historical chronology combined with Newton's research, new historical chronologists were able to reach the following non-superficial conclusions:
There were three successive Roman civilizations. The first Roman civilization or the first Rome was established at the Delta region of Egypt, now Alexandria. This civilization lasted for nearly four centuries before it was forcefully usurped by the Mohammedan Saracens around 6th-7th century of the Common Era.
The second Roman civilization or the second Rome (I.e. Byzantine) was established in Constantinople, present day Turkey, where the Roman patriarchs built the first Christian church, the church of Hagia Sophia. The second Rome lasted for nearly seven centuries before it was forcefully usurped by the Ottoman Turks around 15th century of the Common Era.
The third Roman civilization or the third Rome was established in the Vatican City, present day Rome, where the Roman patriarchs rebuilt the church of Hagia Sophia and named it St. Peter's Basilica. The third Rome is the new Rome we're all familiar with today which has only been in existence for nearly five centuries.
Why is it imperative for a student of history to carefully study the three Roman civilizations above?
1. Such a student would understand why the world is the way it is today.
2. He/she would fully understand why the Pope issued an edict for the Saracens and the Africans to be reduced to servitude.
3. He/she would understand why Africa is in the shape it is today.
4. He/she would fully understand why Mohammedanism, now Islam, is a form of Nestorian or Monophysitic Christianity.
5. He/she would understand why the Wahhabists in the House Saud collude with the Zionists.
6. He/she would fully understand why the Hans of Asia patrolled their high and low seas for nearly three Centuries to keep the Christian missionaries away from their shores.
7. He/she would fully understand why Christianity is nothing but European cultural supremacy.
8. He/she would definitely understand why much of Western civilization developed in Africa (I.e.Egypt) and Constantinople, present day Turkey.
What can we deduce from Newton's research?
1. The Western civilization is a Christian civilization by all standards.
2. The star catalog of Ptolemy Almagest which Joseph Scalinger used to formulate the chronology of Ancient civilizations might have been altered, deliberately, by the Church of Rome.
3. The Greco-Roman history was backdated by at least 500 years.
Using modern knowledge of historical chronology combined with Newton's research, new historical chronologists were able to reach the following non-superficial conclusions:
There were three successive Roman civilizations. The first Roman civilization or the first Rome was established at the Delta region of Egypt, now Alexandria. This civilization lasted for nearly four centuries before it was forcefully usurped by the Mohammedan Saracens around 6th-7th century of the Common Era.
The second Roman civilization or the second Rome (I.e. Byzantine) was established in Constantinople, present day Turkey, where the Roman patriarchs built the first Christian church, the church of Hagia Sophia. The second Rome lasted for nearly seven centuries before it was forcefully usurped by the Ottoman Turks around 15th century of the Common Era.
The third Roman civilization or the third Rome was established in the Vatican City, present day Rome, where the Roman patriarchs rebuilt the church of Hagia Sophia and named it St. Peter's Basilica. The third Rome is the new Rome we're all familiar with today which has only been in existence for nearly five centuries.
Why is it imperative for a student of history to carefully study the three Roman civilizations above?
1. Such a student would understand why the world is the way it is today.
2. He/she would fully understand why the Pope issued an edict for the Saracens and the Africans to be reduced to servitude.
3. He/she would understand why Africa is in the shape it is today.
4. He/she would fully understand why Mohammedanism, now Islam, is a form of Nestorian or Monophysitic Christianity.
5. He/she would understand why the Wahhabists in the House Saud collude with the Zionists.
6. He/she would fully understand why the Hans of Asia patrolled their high and low seas for nearly three Centuries to keep the Christian missionaries away from their shores.
7. He/she would fully understand why Christianity is nothing but European cultural supremacy.
8. He/she would definitely understand why much of Western civilization developed in Africa (I.e.Egypt) and Constantinople, present day Turkey.
Socratic Question
In one of his many lectures, Christopher Hitchens said, even if Socrates never existed as a historical figure, whoever invented and advanced the socratic philosophical ideas and method was a genius. While I was pondering on why an intellectual heavyweight like Hitchens would doubt the existence of one of the most celebrated Western philosophers, it quickly dawned on me that he was simply thinking out loud the "Socratic question."
The Socratic question is simply the age-old question about the historical existence of Socrates and his writings. But this question is deemed unsolvable. In other words, it's seemingly impossible to truly ascertain if Socrates actually did live and develop the philosophical ideas attributed to him. Well, I'm not here to answer or solve the Socratic question. Rather, i'm only here to provoke your thought process!
In this provocation, I'll leave Socrates alone, at least for know, and move on to Plato. This is where it gets very interesting! Only a loony would doubt the existence of Plato; the B.C era, great Greek philosopher. Well, so I thought, until I discovered another Plato, Gemistus Pletho, in Constantinople, in the 15th Century of the common era.
According to the traditional history, Gemistus Pletho was a 15th Century Neoplatonist, from Constantinople, who reintroduced Platonic philosophical ideas and method into the West. Are you thinking what I was thinking: how on earth did a Neoplatonist (I.e. Gemistus Pletho), in 15th Century Constantinople, suddenly discover all the long-lost writings of Plato nearly 2 thousand years after Plato, decipher all the writings which were supposedly written in old Greek, and reintroduce them to the West? How did Gemistus Pletho even stumble upon Plato's materials in Constantinople?
As far as I'm concerned, traditional Plato was a phantom copy of Gemistus Pletho, who actually lived around 15th Century CE in Constantinople! Anyway, there's something I want the students of history to fully understand: nobody alive a thousand years ago or even in the Middle Ages could decipher the writings and the language of those who lived in the B.C era, nor is there anybody today who can possibly attempt that feat. In other words, the totality of B.C era history was created in the Middle Ages.
Question everything because the world is a matrix of lies!
The Socratic question is simply the age-old question about the historical existence of Socrates and his writings. But this question is deemed unsolvable. In other words, it's seemingly impossible to truly ascertain if Socrates actually did live and develop the philosophical ideas attributed to him. Well, I'm not here to answer or solve the Socratic question. Rather, i'm only here to provoke your thought process!
In this provocation, I'll leave Socrates alone, at least for know, and move on to Plato. This is where it gets very interesting! Only a loony would doubt the existence of Plato; the B.C era, great Greek philosopher. Well, so I thought, until I discovered another Plato, Gemistus Pletho, in Constantinople, in the 15th Century of the common era.
According to the traditional history, Gemistus Pletho was a 15th Century Neoplatonist, from Constantinople, who reintroduced Platonic philosophical ideas and method into the West. Are you thinking what I was thinking: how on earth did a Neoplatonist (I.e. Gemistus Pletho), in 15th Century Constantinople, suddenly discover all the long-lost writings of Plato nearly 2 thousand years after Plato, decipher all the writings which were supposedly written in old Greek, and reintroduce them to the West? How did Gemistus Pletho even stumble upon Plato's materials in Constantinople?
As far as I'm concerned, traditional Plato was a phantom copy of Gemistus Pletho, who actually lived around 15th Century CE in Constantinople! Anyway, there's something I want the students of history to fully understand: nobody alive a thousand years ago or even in the Middle Ages could decipher the writings and the language of those who lived in the B.C era, nor is there anybody today who can possibly attempt that feat. In other words, the totality of B.C era history was created in the Middle Ages.
Question everything because the world is a matrix of lies!
Phantom Doubling
In writing, it's called phantom doubling or an act of creating multiple copies of the same story. But, in acting, it's simply called doubling or an act of casting one actor for multiple roles in one movie scene. While I can't tell you where the concept of phantom doubling originated from, I can surely tell you that the concept was popularized by the Shakespearean writers, in the Middle Ages. There are tons of stories that are replete with phantom doubling, but time and space would only permit me to reveal a few.
Here we go: the story of Socrates in "Ancient Greece" is a phantom copy of the story of Socrates Scholasticus or Socrates of Constantinople. Similarly, the story of Plato in "Ancient Greece" is a phantom copy of the story of Gemistos Pletho in Constantinople. The story of Aristotle in "Ancient Greece" is a phantom copy of the story of Georgios Kourtesios Scholarios (aka Ariostesios) in Constantinople. And lastly, the story of Alexandria the Great or Iskandar the conqueror is a phantom copy of the story of Mehmed II the Great conqueror of Constantinople.
Now, let's juxtapose, piecemeal, the phantom copies and the originals: Aristole was said to be Plato's student in Ancient Greece. Similarly, Scholarios (aka Ariostesios) was said to be Gemistos Pletho's student in Constantinople. Plato and Aristotle both travelled to Egypt and studied there. Gemistos Pletho and Scholarios did same. Aristotle opposed some of Plato's teachings and may have challenged Plato openly. Scholarios did the same to Gemistos Pletho, in the Middle Ages. It gets very interesting! Aristotle was said to be Alexandria's tutor in Ancient Greece. Similarly, Scholarios or Ariostesiosi was Mehmed II mentor in Constantinople. And lastly, Alexandria supposedly conquered Persia at a young age of 21-22, his biggest conquest. Similarly, Mehmed II conquered Constantinople around the same age.
I maintain that, there's no Greek civilization in the Ancient times. The so-called Ancient Greek civilization, in traditional history, was a phantom copy of the Byzantine era, Aegean city state of Athens - Athens being the intellectual capital of Byzantine while Constantinople was its political capital. As evidenced by the phantom stories above, every major Greek celebrities, in the traditional history, was actually a phantom double of others in Constantinople, in the Middle Ages.
The question is: why the pretended antiquity of Greece? In other words, why did the Scaligerites or Jesuit scholars write Greece into ancient history? First off, it was the Jesuits scholars who created the discipline of history based on a Biblical chronology or timeline they, themselves, created. Consequently, it's expedient for the Jesuit scholars to backdate the history of Greece, into late antiquity, since the first known Bibles were written in Greek (I.e. The Septuagint and Codex SINAITICUS). In other words, Ancient Greece had to be created, as a B.C era civilization, to explain away the mystery of why the first Bible was written in Greek and not in Hebrew.
The world is a matrix of lies!
Here we go: the story of Socrates in "Ancient Greece" is a phantom copy of the story of Socrates Scholasticus or Socrates of Constantinople. Similarly, the story of Plato in "Ancient Greece" is a phantom copy of the story of Gemistos Pletho in Constantinople. The story of Aristotle in "Ancient Greece" is a phantom copy of the story of Georgios Kourtesios Scholarios (aka Ariostesios) in Constantinople. And lastly, the story of Alexandria the Great or Iskandar the conqueror is a phantom copy of the story of Mehmed II the Great conqueror of Constantinople.
Now, let's juxtapose, piecemeal, the phantom copies and the originals: Aristole was said to be Plato's student in Ancient Greece. Similarly, Scholarios (aka Ariostesios) was said to be Gemistos Pletho's student in Constantinople. Plato and Aristotle both travelled to Egypt and studied there. Gemistos Pletho and Scholarios did same. Aristotle opposed some of Plato's teachings and may have challenged Plato openly. Scholarios did the same to Gemistos Pletho, in the Middle Ages. It gets very interesting! Aristotle was said to be Alexandria's tutor in Ancient Greece. Similarly, Scholarios or Ariostesiosi was Mehmed II mentor in Constantinople. And lastly, Alexandria supposedly conquered Persia at a young age of 21-22, his biggest conquest. Similarly, Mehmed II conquered Constantinople around the same age.
I maintain that, there's no Greek civilization in the Ancient times. The so-called Ancient Greek civilization, in traditional history, was a phantom copy of the Byzantine era, Aegean city state of Athens - Athens being the intellectual capital of Byzantine while Constantinople was its political capital. As evidenced by the phantom stories above, every major Greek celebrities, in the traditional history, was actually a phantom double of others in Constantinople, in the Middle Ages.
The question is: why the pretended antiquity of Greece? In other words, why did the Scaligerites or Jesuit scholars write Greece into ancient history? First off, it was the Jesuits scholars who created the discipline of history based on a Biblical chronology or timeline they, themselves, created. Consequently, it's expedient for the Jesuit scholars to backdate the history of Greece, into late antiquity, since the first known Bibles were written in Greek (I.e. The Septuagint and Codex SINAITICUS). In other words, Ancient Greece had to be created, as a B.C era civilization, to explain away the mystery of why the first Bible was written in Greek and not in Hebrew.
The world is a matrix of lies!
Saturday, July 2, 2016
The Great Debate, IFA and the Two-truths.
It was recorded, in history, as the battle of the greats. It's not what you think! It's not a fist fight; it's a battle of the beautiful minds. It's a great debate.
The show was set at the Temple of Amen in Menefa, now Memphis. The temple was as majestic as the Pharaoh, himself, sitting royally on his throne. Standing next to the pharaoh, on stage, were two Maggistos. On the right was Djehuti, the African (aka Thoth, Idris), and on the left was Hermes, the Greek. The audience was an army of Horite priests. They're as interesting as the topic of the debate: "what's the greatest number?"
Hermes opened up the debate by pronouncing, emphatically, "10" the greatest number. Without much ado, Djehuti stepped forward and pronounced "2" as the greatest number. The epistemology of number 10 being deemed the greatest number is self-evident - humans have ten fingers. But 2, not so much; it's counter-intuitive.
The pharaoh couldn't believe his ears. He was visibly annoyed. He looked at Djehuti and asked, "how could number 2 be greater than 10?" The Horite priests nodded their heads in agreement. Djehuti stepped forward to defend his thesis and his waning reputation. He looked up and asked the Horite priests: "are you all ignorant of your craft?" "Do you not know that 2 is the number of divination?" - in other words, 2 is the number of IFA. In a more conciliatory tone, he further explained himself to the audience: "when I spoke of 2 as the greatest number, I wasn't talking about what one could count with one's fingers. I was talking, however, about the hidden and the revealed, odd and even, the two-truths, the universal opposites!" The debate ended as scheduled. Djehuti won. He was already great, but with his victory, he's now thrice great (Trismegistus).
Fast forward to the Common Era. The greatest numbers die hard! The Greco-Romans invented a composite God, IESUS XPICTOC (Jesus the Christ). They set his first initial "I" to number 1, the beginning and his last initial "X" to their greatest number, 10, the end - Roman numerals; the Alpha and the Omega!
Meanwhile, somewhere in Spain, a self-taught philosopher, Raymond Lull, was obsessed with Djehuti who lived Millenia prior. Lull had read about the great debate in the temple of Amen, in Menefa, and had made it his life's mission to decode Djehuti's "two-truths." He learned, from a reliable source that, the Chinese were using the "two-truths" for divination - Ikin or I Ching. How, he couldn't discern! He turned to the Almoravid Africans in Córdoba, knowing they're gifted diviners, and asked them about the two-truths. The Moors gave him the break he had sought all his life. "The two-truths is Ifa, binary, 0s and 1s," they revealed to him! Lull went on to build his logic gates on IFA, which is the basis of all computer systems, today.
All in all, the Greco-Romans went on to conquer the world with their invented God, but IFA, being the basis of computer system, is freeing the minds of people around the world, today.
The show was set at the Temple of Amen in Menefa, now Memphis. The temple was as majestic as the Pharaoh, himself, sitting royally on his throne. Standing next to the pharaoh, on stage, were two Maggistos. On the right was Djehuti, the African (aka Thoth, Idris), and on the left was Hermes, the Greek. The audience was an army of Horite priests. They're as interesting as the topic of the debate: "what's the greatest number?"
Hermes opened up the debate by pronouncing, emphatically, "10" the greatest number. Without much ado, Djehuti stepped forward and pronounced "2" as the greatest number. The epistemology of number 10 being deemed the greatest number is self-evident - humans have ten fingers. But 2, not so much; it's counter-intuitive.
The pharaoh couldn't believe his ears. He was visibly annoyed. He looked at Djehuti and asked, "how could number 2 be greater than 10?" The Horite priests nodded their heads in agreement. Djehuti stepped forward to defend his thesis and his waning reputation. He looked up and asked the Horite priests: "are you all ignorant of your craft?" "Do you not know that 2 is the number of divination?" - in other words, 2 is the number of IFA. In a more conciliatory tone, he further explained himself to the audience: "when I spoke of 2 as the greatest number, I wasn't talking about what one could count with one's fingers. I was talking, however, about the hidden and the revealed, odd and even, the two-truths, the universal opposites!" The debate ended as scheduled. Djehuti won. He was already great, but with his victory, he's now thrice great (Trismegistus).
Fast forward to the Common Era. The greatest numbers die hard! The Greco-Romans invented a composite God, IESUS XPICTOC (Jesus the Christ). They set his first initial "I" to number 1, the beginning and his last initial "X" to their greatest number, 10, the end - Roman numerals; the Alpha and the Omega!
Meanwhile, somewhere in Spain, a self-taught philosopher, Raymond Lull, was obsessed with Djehuti who lived Millenia prior. Lull had read about the great debate in the temple of Amen, in Menefa, and had made it his life's mission to decode Djehuti's "two-truths." He learned, from a reliable source that, the Chinese were using the "two-truths" for divination - Ikin or I Ching. How, he couldn't discern! He turned to the Almoravid Africans in Córdoba, knowing they're gifted diviners, and asked them about the two-truths. The Moors gave him the break he had sought all his life. "The two-truths is Ifa, binary, 0s and 1s," they revealed to him! Lull went on to build his logic gates on IFA, which is the basis of all computer systems, today.
All in all, the Greco-Romans went on to conquer the world with their invented God, but IFA, being the basis of computer system, is freeing the minds of people around the world, today.
Tuesday, June 14, 2016
Roman Numerals and letter to digit denotation
Classical chronologists originally used letters to denote digits. For example, the Greco-Romans believed that "10" was a sacred number; consequently, they denoted the first letter of the prevalent anagram of their anointed, XPICTOC (Anglicized Christ), with the number 10. That is, X=10.
However, when Iesus (Anglicized Jesus) was elevated to the Christ status, the chronologists denoted the first letter of his name (I.e. I) with number 1; that is I=1, and they started their calendar from year 1 since Iesus. For example, year 100 since Iesus = I.100 = 1100 AD. Similarly, year 200 since Iesus = I.200 = 1200 AD etc.
According to the new chronologists, Fomenko et al, the mystery of "letter to digit" denotation was plausibly lost in the Middle Ages; consequently, the Jesuit-chronologists of the Middle Ages dropped the letter I, erroneously shifting the Western chronology or timeline back 1000 years. For example, year 100 since Iesus or I.100 (I.e. 1100AD) was erroneously recorded as year 100 AD after the first letter "I" had been dropped. Subsequent events and years were erroneously recorded based on the same reason and rationale as in year 100 example above.
The question now is: can the mainstream or Scaligerian chronology be trusted? Question everything!!!
However, when Iesus (Anglicized Jesus) was elevated to the Christ status, the chronologists denoted the first letter of his name (I.e. I) with number 1; that is I=1, and they started their calendar from year 1 since Iesus. For example, year 100 since Iesus = I.100 = 1100 AD. Similarly, year 200 since Iesus = I.200 = 1200 AD etc.
According to the new chronologists, Fomenko et al, the mystery of "letter to digit" denotation was plausibly lost in the Middle Ages; consequently, the Jesuit-chronologists of the Middle Ages dropped the letter I, erroneously shifting the Western chronology or timeline back 1000 years. For example, year 100 since Iesus or I.100 (I.e. 1100AD) was erroneously recorded as year 100 AD after the first letter "I" had been dropped. Subsequent events and years were erroneously recorded based on the same reason and rationale as in year 100 example above.
The question now is: can the mainstream or Scaligerian chronology be trusted? Question everything!!!
Low-level crypto scheme using Odu Ifa bits.
Let me describe, briefly, how Odu Ifa can be adapted to protect the integrity of large volume of data (I.e low-level crypto scheme). I shall use two popular Odus, Ejiogbe and Oyeku Meji, to buttress my point.
Ejiogbe is a masculine Odu; it's spatial representation is:
I I
I I
I I
I I
and it's binary code is: 11111111.
An Ilari (a learned spy) can store valuable information in Ejiogbe and protect its integrity using the binary code of Ejiogbe's perfect complement. In other words, a receiver must know Ejiogbe's perfect complement and its binary code to decrypt the message stored in Ejiogbe.
Let's assume I was the receiver. As a learned receiver, I know that Ejiogbe's perfect complement is Oyeku-Meji. Oyeku-Meji is a feminine Odu; its spatial representation is this:
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
and it's binary code is: 00000000. With Oyeku-Meji's binary code, I would be able to decrypt the message enclosed inside Ejiogbe. Needless to say, this is an elementary crypto-scheme. It can be fine-tuned into a more sophisticated crypto-scheme.
Once again, Ifa has evolved, but we must study its evolution.
Ejiogbe is a masculine Odu; it's spatial representation is:
I I
I I
I I
I I
and it's binary code is: 11111111.
An Ilari (a learned spy) can store valuable information in Ejiogbe and protect its integrity using the binary code of Ejiogbe's perfect complement. In other words, a receiver must know Ejiogbe's perfect complement and its binary code to decrypt the message stored in Ejiogbe.
Let's assume I was the receiver. As a learned receiver, I know that Ejiogbe's perfect complement is Oyeku-Meji. Oyeku-Meji is a feminine Odu; its spatial representation is this:
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
and it's binary code is: 00000000. With Oyeku-Meji's binary code, I would be able to decrypt the message enclosed inside Ejiogbe. Needless to say, this is an elementary crypto-scheme. It can be fine-tuned into a more sophisticated crypto-scheme.
Once again, Ifa has evolved, but we must study its evolution.
Why is Ifa more than cultural information?
Just as prime numbers are the building blocks of all natural numbers, Ifa (base 2) is the building block of all bases of natural numbers.
In number theory, prime field is the smallest subfield containing both 0 and 1; whereby, 0 is an even count and 1 is an odd count (I.e. the two legs of Ifa). And upon combining the two legs (0,1), an infinite geometric series would emerge. So, Ifa is an infinite geometric series generator.
We call upon all young Awos, who are ethno-mathematically inclined, to move Ifa from cultural information level to species or technological information level. There is no doubt that Ifa will impact Yoruba civilization significantly if it reaches the level of technological information.
In number theory, prime field is the smallest subfield containing both 0 and 1; whereby, 0 is an even count and 1 is an odd count (I.e. the two legs of Ifa). And upon combining the two legs (0,1), an infinite geometric series would emerge. So, Ifa is an infinite geometric series generator.
We call upon all young Awos, who are ethno-mathematically inclined, to move Ifa from cultural information level to species or technological information level. There is no doubt that Ifa will impact Yoruba civilization significantly if it reaches the level of technological information.
Debunking the myth of "almighty" Sumer.
According to the Scaligerian or mainstream historians, Sumer was the first ancient urban civilization in the historical region of Southern Mesopotamia. Sumerians are credited with the invention of writing; thereby, putting Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilization.
Imagine I sat down in my world civilization class for one long semester being fed this fantastic lie. I hope you now understand why I ditched school altogether and became a student of Ifa.
Anyway, the so called Proto-Sumerian writing script or Sumerian cuneiform tablets are routine accounting clay tablets that were created for the mundane purposes of keeping accounts and records. In other words, the Sumerian cuneiform is an accounting device and not a writing script; thereby, destroying the myth of Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilization - to be the cradle of civilization, you must be the first to invent writing.
Why did Western academia invent Sumer and the myth of Mesopotamia being the cradle of civilization?
1. Ideological and racist reasons - a clever attempt to move the original cradle of civilization from the Nile Valley in Africa to the Tigris and Euphrates in the invented "Middle-East."
2. An attempt to historicize Biblical civilization of Babylon in the Old Testament. Remember, the mainstream history of all ancient civilizations was created by the Scaligerites using invented Biblical chronology or timeline. Consequently, Sumer or Mesopotamia is an academic duplicate of Biblical Babylon, both invented and fictitious!
Now, if the Sumerians were not the first in history to invent writing, who were the first to do so? The people we know today in history as the Ancient Egyptians were the first to invent writing, putting Ancient Egypt as the cradle of civilization. Every writing script we have today originated from the ancient Egyptian writing scripts: the pictographic Hieroglyphs, the Phonetic I alphabet or Heratic script, and lastly the Phonetic II alphabet or demotic script. It's from the phonetic Pharaonic Egyptian alphabet that the Greek/Latin alphabets developed.
Writing is a system, and like all systems, can only be invented once. The Ancient Egyptians, not Sumerians, invented the system of writing and every other civilization just copied their invention.
Imagine I sat down in my world civilization class for one long semester being fed this fantastic lie. I hope you now understand why I ditched school altogether and became a student of Ifa.
Anyway, the so called Proto-Sumerian writing script or Sumerian cuneiform tablets are routine accounting clay tablets that were created for the mundane purposes of keeping accounts and records. In other words, the Sumerian cuneiform is an accounting device and not a writing script; thereby, destroying the myth of Mesopotamia as the cradle of civilization - to be the cradle of civilization, you must be the first to invent writing.
Why did Western academia invent Sumer and the myth of Mesopotamia being the cradle of civilization?
1. Ideological and racist reasons - a clever attempt to move the original cradle of civilization from the Nile Valley in Africa to the Tigris and Euphrates in the invented "Middle-East."
2. An attempt to historicize Biblical civilization of Babylon in the Old Testament. Remember, the mainstream history of all ancient civilizations was created by the Scaligerites using invented Biblical chronology or timeline. Consequently, Sumer or Mesopotamia is an academic duplicate of Biblical Babylon, both invented and fictitious!
Now, if the Sumerians were not the first in history to invent writing, who were the first to do so? The people we know today in history as the Ancient Egyptians were the first to invent writing, putting Ancient Egypt as the cradle of civilization. Every writing script we have today originated from the ancient Egyptian writing scripts: the pictographic Hieroglyphs, the Phonetic I alphabet or Heratic script, and lastly the Phonetic II alphabet or demotic script. It's from the phonetic Pharaonic Egyptian alphabet that the Greek/Latin alphabets developed.
Writing is a system, and like all systems, can only be invented once. The Ancient Egyptians, not Sumerians, invented the system of writing and every other civilization just copied their invention.
Prime Numbers And Traditional Crypto Scheme
It will take 28 years for a prey that migrates every 7 years to be eaten by a predator that migrates every 4 years. However, it will only take 16 years for a prey that migrates every 8 years to be eaten by a predator that migrates every 4 years. So, by choosing odd years to migrate, the former prey extends its life expectancy by 12 years.
Interestingly, in the Old Oyo Kingdom, in the time of war, the Alaafin (I.e. the commander in chief of armed forces) and the Oyomesi (I.e. traditional senators) often chose odd days to send cryptic messages (I.e Aroko) to the Aare Onakakanofo (I.e. Generalissimo) on the battle field.
Wait for it: in pure math, it's found that most odd numbers are prime, and they're very difficult to guess in a sequence, making them excellent crypto keys. In fact, very recently, anthropologists discovered an insect in South America that uses a prime-numbered life-cycle to drive natural selection.
It's not surprising to me that some insects use a prime-numbered life-cycle to drive natural selection, for insects are connected to nature and their environment. It's very surprising, however, that, in the Old Oyo Kingdom, the Alaafin and the Oyomesi adopted same "prime-numbered crypto-scheme" to game their enemies. Could it be that the Alaafin and the Oyomesi were connected to nature and they studied their natural environment?
Interestingly, in the Old Oyo Kingdom, in the time of war, the Alaafin (I.e. the commander in chief of armed forces) and the Oyomesi (I.e. traditional senators) often chose odd days to send cryptic messages (I.e Aroko) to the Aare Onakakanofo (I.e. Generalissimo) on the battle field.
Wait for it: in pure math, it's found that most odd numbers are prime, and they're very difficult to guess in a sequence, making them excellent crypto keys. In fact, very recently, anthropologists discovered an insect in South America that uses a prime-numbered life-cycle to drive natural selection.
It's not surprising to me that some insects use a prime-numbered life-cycle to drive natural selection, for insects are connected to nature and their environment. It's very surprising, however, that, in the Old Oyo Kingdom, the Alaafin and the Oyomesi adopted same "prime-numbered crypto-scheme" to game their enemies. Could it be that the Alaafin and the Oyomesi were connected to nature and they studied their natural environment?
Saturday, February 27, 2016
Arabic Legend About Ifa
The myth of Ifa being the Arabic equivalent of "Setiyu" was popularized by the Fuji exponent, Ayinde Barrister. In his signature style of mixing Quranic narratives with Yoruba philosophy, Barrister treated his listeners to the story of "Anabi Setiyu," which goes like this: "I know the name of Setiyu......the name of Setiyu is the name of Ifa."
It's plausible that Ayinde Barrister, like many Yoruba Muslims, constructed Ifa-Setiyu parallelism out of the Arabic legend that links the origin of Ifa or divinatory geomancy to their famous prophet, Idris (aka Djehuti the Egyptian; Enoch the Hebrew and Hermes Trismegistus the Greek).
There are only two verses dedicated to Idris in the Quran; they're vague at best and had nothing to do with Ifa. Although, the Quran is silent about Ifa, but somehow it found its way into the Hadith. In the Hadith, Arab pseudo-scholars, in their usual style of mixing Greek mythology and Egyptian mysteries to interpret Quranic verses, constructed a legend around Idris, linking him to Ifa.
According to this legend, Idris received the science of divinatory geomancy (I.e. Ilm al-Raml or Ifa) from Jubril in a dream, and he subsequently passed the story to a learned King of India, Tumtum al-Hindi, who documented the story in detail for Idris. Other legends abound!
Let me separate the truth from the legends and set the story straight. The Quran is essentially the Torah or the book of the upright ones. And as I've previously mentioned, the Hadith is a compendium of Arabic narratives outside of the Quran, which itself is an odd attempt by Arab pseudo-scholars to use Greek mythology and Egyptian mysteries to interpret the Torah. Consequently, the Hadith must be taken with a grain of salt.
It suffices to note that Ifa has nothing to do with Setiyu, nor does it have anything to do with Idris. Ifa is the totality of Yoruba's spiritual, moral and natural philosophies.
It's plausible that Ayinde Barrister, like many Yoruba Muslims, constructed Ifa-Setiyu parallelism out of the Arabic legend that links the origin of Ifa or divinatory geomancy to their famous prophet, Idris (aka Djehuti the Egyptian; Enoch the Hebrew and Hermes Trismegistus the Greek).
There are only two verses dedicated to Idris in the Quran; they're vague at best and had nothing to do with Ifa. Although, the Quran is silent about Ifa, but somehow it found its way into the Hadith. In the Hadith, Arab pseudo-scholars, in their usual style of mixing Greek mythology and Egyptian mysteries to interpret Quranic verses, constructed a legend around Idris, linking him to Ifa.
According to this legend, Idris received the science of divinatory geomancy (I.e. Ilm al-Raml or Ifa) from Jubril in a dream, and he subsequently passed the story to a learned King of India, Tumtum al-Hindi, who documented the story in detail for Idris. Other legends abound!
Let me separate the truth from the legends and set the story straight. The Quran is essentially the Torah or the book of the upright ones. And as I've previously mentioned, the Hadith is a compendium of Arabic narratives outside of the Quran, which itself is an odd attempt by Arab pseudo-scholars to use Greek mythology and Egyptian mysteries to interpret the Torah. Consequently, the Hadith must be taken with a grain of salt.
It suffices to note that Ifa has nothing to do with Setiyu, nor does it have anything to do with Idris. Ifa is the totality of Yoruba's spiritual, moral and natural philosophies.
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
THREE TYPES OF HISTORY
To those who are interested in history and philosophy; particularly history, it's imperative to know that there are three types of history.
1. Theological or biblical history
2. Scaligerian or mainstream history
3. New "chronology" history
Theological history is basically history according to the "holy" books. This is the type of history that's taught in seminary and Islamic schools, and the only type of history that most religious people accept to be true.
Scaligerian history or mainstream history is nothing but history according to the Western narratives. This is the type of history that's taught in most colleges around the world; more specifically, in the West.
New "chronology" history is history that's formulated based on statistical analysis of historical texts and epochs. This is perhaps the closet history to real history.
It suffices to say that nobody really knows what happened in antiquity, for the ancients didn't write their own history. However, using archeological, epigraphic, and numismatic evidentiary facts, one can attempt to reconstruct what happened in antiquity.
So, from all available evidentiary facts, theological history (I.e. Judeo-Christian and Islamic histories) can be dismissed as being fictitious and a work of myth. Having said that, Scaligerian or mainstream history is perhaps just as fictitious as the theological history, for they're both formulated by the same Jesuits scholars out of the Vatican. Unbeknownst to many out there, mainstream history was formulated and developed based on theological or biblical chronology.
All in all, I implore every student of history and philosophy to be mindful of what he or she espouses as true history.
THE METAPHYSICS OF ESU, A YORUBA ORISA.
I cannot overemphasize that to fully understand what or who Eshu is, it's paramount for one to fully understand the metaphysical concept of Ori and freewill.
According to the Yoruba pantheon, Ori or the immaterial head is the initial condition that determines the outcome of human activities.
Human activities are ever complex and random, for humans exist in a chaos dynamic world (Aye loja). And while the outcome of the ever complex human activities is totally deterministic, free will or human's ability to randomly choose makes this outcome rather unpredictable.
It suffices to say that freewill or choice is a binary process (I.e. Digital process), which, intrinsically, is the nature of reality itself and the nature of Eshu Lalu - Tibi Tire!
Consequently, it's no surprise that Eshu is a neutral force that represents the transitional or center point of the crossroad where one must make a decision. In other words, Eshu symbolizes binary choice, perfect balance, and the dualistic nature of reality (I.e. Male and female principles, yin and yang, zeros and ones, negative and positive, good and evil etc).
Unfortunately, Bishop Ajayi Crowther, as a useful tool of the missionary propaganda, had taken away the inherent, dualistic nature of Eshu, reducing Eshu to a negative principle (I.e. Devil or Satan). Again, Eshu is not Satan; rather, Eshu embodies both negative and positive principles.
ZABAD STONE & ISLAM
Zabad stone is a pre-Islamic stone tablet found at Zabad in Syria with a bold trilingual inscription. In other words, Zabad stone is the Arabic Rosseta stone. But unlike Rosseta stone, which is a bilingual dedication in Egyptian Hieroglyphs, Egyptian demotic script and Greek, the Zabad stone is a trilingual dedication in Greek, Syriac and Arabic.
Godfrey Higgins in his book, Anacalypsis, contended that Greek, Aramaic/Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic were all connected, perhaps, to the same root. Be that as it may, the Zabad tablet further highlights this connection. While the root of pre-Islamic Arabic script can be traced back to Southern Arabia or Yemen, scholars believe that the root of Quranic Arabic can be traced back to the orthodox-Christian provinces of Al Hira and Al Anbar, in the present day South-Central and Western Iraq.
Now that we have some knowledge about the root of Quranic Arabic, let us look at some Quranic words and names; popularly, thought to be of Arabic origin but that aren't.
1. Quran
2. Allah
3. Hadith
4. Hira
5. Sura
6. Muhammed
The word QUR'AN came out of the triconsonantal Judeo-Christian Syriac root "QRN," meaning to read the Pentateuch or the Bible.
The name ALLAH can be traced back to its Syriac root "ALAHA," which can further be traced back to its Egyptian root "UR RA," meaning the great one, the SUN.
The word HADITH, according to the traditional Islamic narrative, stands for the compendium of literary work outside the Qur'an. However, Haditha was a historical Christian stronghold just outside the Al Anbar province, present day Iraq, where the Kufic Arabic script was formulated (I.e. "Al Bariac" script).
HIRA is the name of the cave where Muhammed supposedly received his first revelations from Allah through Jubril or Gabriel. However, Al Hira was actually an ancient Christian province, present day South-Central Iraq, where Qur'anic Arabic script was partially formulated (I.e. Al Hiraic script).
The word SURA, according to the traditional Islamic narrative, means a chapter of the Quran. However, "SURA" was a historical Jewish city state in ancient Mesopotamia, present day Iraq. It was the seat of the popular Jewish academy, the Sura Yeshiva Academy.
The name Hammed can be traced back to its triconsonantal Judeo-Christian Syriac root "HMD," meaning praiseworthy. The question is: what's praiseworthy? Well what's praiseworthy is "MU," the Egyptian word for water. Thus, the name Muhammed came from the combination of Syriac and Egyptian words.
Now if Muhammed supposedly received the Quran at cave Hira from god, how is it that the key words in the Quran are not even of Arabic origin. Is Islam another form of Christianity?
* Culled from Shakka Ahmose lectures "Christian/Judeo Reality of Islam*
WHERE IS AFRICAN PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE?
Frustrated African youths often ask me: "Where are our philosophy and science?" This is a good question that I wish African intellectuals would answer, but they cannot, for majority of African intellectuals seem to think that scientific and philosophical thought processes are universal. According to them, developing an African scientific thought process that's grounded on African epistemological framework is a waste of time since one can be expatriated "ready made" into Africa from Europe - this is what I call "ready made" pathology. Ironically, it's these same intellectuals, who constantly lament the lack of scientific and technological development in Africa, not realizing that Africa cannot develop in these areas using "ready made" or imported epistemological and philosophical frameworks. However, Africa can only develop scientifically and technologically when Africans endeavor to formulate their scientific thought processes based on African epistemology and philosophy.
I respectfully submit that while science, as an objective knowledge of nature, is universal, the thought processes that go into the formulation of scientific principles are totally relative to one's environment. In fact, in the sequential order of the evolution of knowledge, the environment is anterior to everything else. That is, it's the environment that shapes people's psychology. People's psychology, in turn, shapes their ecology. Their ecology goes on to shape their mythology and spirituality. Their mythology and spirituality shape their epistemology. Their epistemology goes on to shape their metaphysics and philosophy. And lastly, their metaphysics and philosophy shape their scientific knowledge - this is the natural sequential order of the evolution of knowledge anywhere on this planet.
So, if the environment plays a major role in the evolution of knowledge, and if no two environments are quite alike, then it is counterproductive to import European philosophy into Africa to help develop African scientific thought process. I contend that African philosophical and scientific thought processes can only be developed through the development and promotion of African-centered curriculum.
African-centered curriculum must be premised on two areas: African moral philosophy and African natural philosophy. The moral philosophy curriculum must cover African customs and customary laws, ethics, value system and African moral principles such as the moral principles of IFA and MAAT. Conversely, the natural philosophy curriculum must cover African arts, history, psychology, metaphysics, philosophy, herbology, medicine and economics.
All in all, it is through the development of an African-centered curriculum that African youths can begin to engage in philosophical and scientific thought processes of their own.
THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME "PALESTINE."
The origin of the name "PALESTINE" is almost lost in another matrix of lies.
According to the biblical and some traditional scholars, the name Palestine is an Anglicized corruption of the name Philistine. This is how the lie goes: the Philistines were said to be non-Semitic enemies of the Israelites in "Ancient Judaea." But for one reason or another, the name Israel was abruptly changed to Philistia or Philistine, now Palestine.
There is circumstantial evidence linking Roman emperor Hadrian with the name change, but the precise date is not certain and the assertion of the scholars above that the name change was invented by emperor Hadrian to blot out Israel from history, and to complete the dissociation of the Israelites with Judaea is strongly disputed by serious scholars, for the name Philistine is not even mentioned once in the SEPTUAGINT (i.e. the first Bible).
Now, let's move from the realm of history to the realm of common sense. The word "philistine" is neither an ancient word nor a Semitic word. The word "Philistine" is an English word! The question now is: why would an ancient people of the so-called Judaea bear, as a collective, an English name (Philistine) when England was non-existed at this time?
Anyway, the name Palaistine(Greek), Anglicized Palestine, is a corruption of the original name Palistan. Etymologically, the word Pali is of Dravidian origin, meaning Shepherds, and the word Stan of the same origin means: house, space or land. Consequently, the word Palistan simply means the Shepherd house or land. Is this why the "Isrealites" were said to be Shepherds?
According to a number of esoteric scholars (Godfrey Higgins et al), Ancient Palestine was a colony of Egypt, and was originally inhabited by a group of Ethiopians from the Western Cush (Chaldeans), and was later inhabited by the immigrants from the Eastern Cush or the Ethiopia of the East (the hyksos, Palis or the Brahmins). Could this be why it's said that the progenitor of the Israelites was Abraham? Abraham or Brahma?
Pay attention!!!
DID HISTORICAL MUHAMMED EXIST?
The mainstream historical narratives of most religions are replete with tall tales and mythologies, which are revised and reinterpreted by later generations. Regarding Islam, Karl Heinz and Gerd Puin used overwhelming epigraphic and numismatic evidentiary facts to challenge mainstream Islamic narratives - facts so compelling that no critical opposition has been able to refute them with comparable and linguistic evidence.
In their book, "The Hidden Origins of Islam," Karl and Gerd make the following claims:
1. The most reliable literary sources about the life of Muhammed were written nearly 200 years after the event they describe.
2. Muhammed and the first four Caliphs, in Islamic narratives, are characters of myth.
3. The name "Muhammed" first appeared on Arab coins during the reign of Abd Al-Malik and not prior.
4. The name "Muhammed" was originally a title like "Christ."
5. The inscription on the Dome of the Rock, "Muhammad Abdu Llahi wa-rasuluhu": "praised be the Servant of God and his messenger," is a Christian statement and not Islamic.
6. The Dome of the Rock built in i.692 by Abd Al-Malik was not originally a mosque but a Byzantine-Syrian church.
7. Classical Arabic can be traced back to Syria. However, Quranic Arabic is a rework and intentional vowelization of the Syriac triconsonantal root systems of Classical Arabic.
So, who's the historical Muhammed.....did he even exist?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)