Firstly, Josephus could not have written any historical account around first Century AD; the era it was claimed he had lived, for history as a subject did not exist at that time. History as a subject was formulated around 16th Century AD by Joseph Scaliger and other Jesuit scholars. And it's not implausible that Flavius Josephus himself was a Christian interpolation on the real or historical Joseph Scaliger, who lived around 16th Century AD.
I want my readers to be aware of the following:
1. Christian/Jesuit historians and translators often "assign" different dates and locations to different accounts of the same historical events, creating multiple "phantom copies" of these events. In other words, Flavius Josephus was a created "phantom copy" of Joseph Scaliger, and their works are different accounts of the same historical events - one is real, but the other is fake.
2. The B.C/A.D conventional or ecclesiastical chronology was largely manufactured by Joseph Justus Scaliger, and his Jesuit comrade, Dionysius Petavius, and it represents a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major cabalistic numbers 333 and 360.
3. No single document in existence can be reliably dated earlier than the 11th Century AD.
4. Histories of "Ancient Rome," "Greece" and dynastic Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy - mostly on the basis of documents of their own making.
5. Histories of the so-called Hebrews and Sumerians are nothing but phantom copies of the historical template of dynastic Egypt - this is why Hebrew and Sumerian archeological records are non-existed!
