Oversimplification or Outright Deception?

Some people call the “theological personification” of solar and celestial bodies an obvious deception or outright lie, but I call it oversimplification. I mean, if you conceived a product; a product you knew very well would sell; a product you knew would change the world, would you not simplify this product to make sure the masses can understand and use it? We all know that it is product simplification that gives the creator or designer a comparative advantage in the market.

Designers understand that consumers are divided into two groups: the elites and the masses. Mankind in general, like consumers, is divided into two groups: the intellectual elites and the masses. The intellectual elites consume to create; they demand facts and originality. However, the masses consume for entertainment; they are indisposed to facts and originality.

Many entrepreneurs in our society today have capitalized on this basic distinction to create abundant wealth for themselves. To give but one example, Bill Gate. Bill Gate's first creation was the command based Disk Operating System (i.e., MS DOS), a close relative of the ultra-superior UNIX Operating System; however, MS DOS was not user friendly and was not appealing to the mainstream. Hence, its use was restricted to the computer intellectual elites, not the masses. It dawned on Mr. Gate that for his product to sell well in the market and generate wealth, he needed to make his product user friendly and appealing to the masses. Mr. Gate listened to his inner self and went ahead to codify MS DOS into a more user friendly graphical user interface, called WINDOWS. Although MS DOS was a better product than MS WINDOWS, the masses prefer the latter because of its user friendliness and its simplicity.

What dawned on Mr. Gate above is reminiscent of what dawned on most writers of the scriptures. The writers of the scriptures came across a very powerful ancient astrotheology, but indulged in oversimplification in order to sell this knowledge to the general populace. That is, they anthropomorphized ancient astrotheology and created tribal stories around it. It was Moses Maimonides (i.e., the writer of the Pentateuch, Torah or the first 5 books of the OT), who says “When I see no other way of teaching a well-established truth except by pleasing one intelligent man and displeasing ten thousand fools, I choose to address myself to the one intelligent man and take no notice whatsoever of the multitude.” In light of this statement, Moses Maimonides divided his thesis into two (Kabbalah and the Torah): one for the intellectual elites and the other for the masses.

 The scripture’s writers considered the ancient texts to be too abstract and metaphysical, and concluded that if left in their original form, they would only make sense to the intellectual elites, but would lead the masses to unbelief. The scripture’s writers were well aware that persons other than the intellectual elites would be exposed to their writings, so they decided to codify their writings in a simple, yet enigmatic style.

They would discuss the same topic in different passages(i.e., Mathew, Mark, Luke and John). They would personify the SUN in the ancient texts as the theological SON of god. They would personify the 12 Zodiacal Constellations or the SUN 12-step movement in higher heavens as the 12 disciples of the SON; the 12 tribes, the 12 brothers of Joseph etc. They would personify the WINTER SOLSTICE as the birth of the SON, and SPRING EQUINOX (when the SUN starts to pass or cross over the equator) as the Passover/liberation of the Israelites from slavery and/or the resurrection of the SON. They would personify the 3-star system pointing to Sirius (i.e., the brightest star in the night sky) as the 3 wise kings tracking the birth of the SON. They would personify the SUN, at the equator in the middle of 4 earthly seasons, as the SON on the cross. They would silhouette the image of the SON from the SUN light in the background to show their intent, but many still refuse to see.

I can understand the scripture writer’s indulgence in “simplistic personification” to sell ancient knowledge to their tribes, but I cannot understand modern masses taking this “simplistic personification” literarily. There are those who we are sure know better, but continue to scare the masses with deception – deception gives them comparative advantage over others. It would be accurate to call such people lairs and falsifiers, and such labels I would accept.

Theology, like MS Windows, appeals to the masses because of its simplicity. However, they both have dire shortcomings. Look around you, the biggest consumers of the personified version of theology are the biggest losers in the world, but the intellectual elites who possess the knowledge of the ancient originals are the rulers of the planet today. Think about it!

I maintain that there are many many suns of god (just look up in the night sky), and there are many many sons of god (just look down at yourself) - as above so below.

Ojo 4/1/13

Nu Ankh or Noah's Ark?

Nu Ankh or the royal boat of Khufu.The boat was originally
placed right in front of the Khufu pyramid in Giza.
It was built to help transport the soul of the dead
Pharaoh via the Nile River to the Milky Way. 

Many scholars believe that what is described, in the scripture, as the Noah's Ark is actually an ancient Egyptian royal yacht called Nu Ankh or the boat of great King Khufu - in Medu Neter, Nu is water and Ankh is eternal life (i.e., the union of male and female principles). However, the story that was created in the scripture to go with this ancient boat might have been lifted from the ancient Sumerian poem, The Epic of Gilgamesh.

 

As above so below!
A dead Pharaoh being  portrayed as the god
Ausar (Osiris), who was believed to be the constellation Orion.
The Ancient Egyptians mapped all of Orion's Constellation
to specific places around Giza. For example, the pyramid of Khufu
maps directly to the first star in the Orion's belt.
The Nile River, right behind the 3 pyramids, maps
directly to the Milky Way. Interestingly, the royal boat of Khufu or
Nu Ankh, though not shown in this picture, was originally placed
right in front of the first pyramid, the Khufu pyramid.

In the Egyptian mythology, a man's soul is said to be mapped to a specific star in the sky. And at the moment of the man's death, the man's matching solar star is believed to drop from the sky (Gerald Massey "Natural Origin" Vol.I). Thus to reconnect the soul of the dead, most importantly the dead king, with its solar star in the afterlife, the royal boat or Nu Ankh was built for this purpose. 

This mythology appears over and over again in many other African regions. In the Yoruba region, it's called Irawo Ja. "Irawo" denotes stars and "Ja"denotes fall or drop. The Yoruba people believe that when a star falls from the night sky, a specific soul is deceased somewhere, and the dead must be mourned – Irawo Ja. The current writer is very familiar with this mythology or superstition.

Historians and archeologists have been digging all over North East Africa (now called the Middle East) for the scripture Noah's Ark, but as they have found nothing to corroborate every other story in the scriptures, they have found nothing remotely similar to Noah’s Ark. However, you can travel to Egypt today and view the 4000-5000 year old Nu Ankh or the royal boat.

I maintain that not a single character mentioned in the scriptures ever existed in history, and every story in the scriptures is a deliberate distortion of the ancient Hindu-Cush mythologies and astrotheologies.

Ojo 3/19/2013

On the Origin of Writing Scripts

I was browsing through one of my favorite blogs today, when I came across a very interesting thesis. The thesis, by and large, attempted to point out the similarities between Japanese and Hebrew writing scripts. The blogger concluded that, based on these similarities, Japanese people must be one of the lost tribes of Israel. I must say that this blogger is asleep because he is awake in some else’s dream of deception. How could anyone attempt to plug his or her glorious ancient history to another that never was?

According to the available historical records, there was never a lost tribe of Israel. In fact, Israel never existed as a physical location in the ancient times, but did exist as a fictitious location in the created scriptures of the middle ages – this is not my focus at this time. My focus at this time is to present an intellectual argument against the plausibility of the claim made in the thesis supra.

Firstly, every well-known writing script today came from a common origin. That there are obvious similarities between Hebrew and Japanese writing scripts does not mean Hebrew and Japanese people came from the same Hebrew tribes, and certianly does not mean that Hebrew and Japanese languages are the same, it just means that Hebrew and Japanese writing scripts came from the same origin. A writing script is a system which, just like any other systems, can only be invented once.

For example, the Wright brothers invented the first air plane in the United States. Although there are various modifications and designs of the original air plane around the world today; be that as it may, they all came from a common origin. Similarly, Karl Benz invented the first modern automobile in 1886. Today, we have various automobile models and designs, but they are all obvious modifications of Karl’s original automobile. Writing scripts, just like air planes, automobiles or any other systems can only be invented once. If this is true, where did all the known writing scripts we have today originate?

Every writing script we have today originated from the ancient Egyptian writing scripts: the pictographic Hieroglyphs, the Phonetic I alphabet or Heratic script, and lastly the Phonetic II alphabet or demotic script. I shall illustrate my point in the enclosed tables below.

Arabic, Hebrew, Syriac, and Greek, placed side by side - notice the similarities. They all came from one source, Pharaonic Egyptian script i.e., Phonetic.  The Greek and Latin scripts are probably the oldest on the list, whereas Hebrew and Arabic are more recent creation. I maintain that Hebrew and Arabic are scripts not languages, and were created as early as 10^th - 15^th century A.D, not in the B.C era as now implied.

  

The Alphabet Chart
Showing the first writing system by the ancient Egyptians: the Hieroglyphic, Hieratic-demotic and the phonetic. It's from the phonetic Pharaonic Egyptian alphabet that the Greek/Latin alphabets developed.



Why is it important to understand the origin of writing scripts? Understanding the origin of writing scripts would help put information in the proper historical perspective. For example, a group of nomads claimed their culture and history dated back to 3500 B.C. The validity of their claim rests on ancient scrolls they had found in the middle of the dessert. The first intellectual question to ask in order to challenge the validity of this claim is: what is the writing script used in these scrolls? If their answer is a script other than the Pharaonic Egyptian script, the scrolls can be said to be fictitious, and this group claim to ancient culture can be dismissed because the only script that existed in 3500 B.C was the Pharaonic Egyptian script.

I must mention that serious scholars had used this approach to challenge the authenticity of the ancient Homeric writings. The writings attributed to Homer (i.e., Iliad and odyssey) were supposedly written when the Greek script was not fully developed. How is it possible that one can compose beautiful poems in a writing form without a writing script? With this question, the “Homeric scholars” have now changed course and concluded that Iliad and Odyssey were originally composed orally, but were translated into a written form at a much later date. This is the power of knowing  the origin of writing scripts.



A Comparison of Hebrew and ancient Japanese. While the similarities are astounding, it does not mean Hebrew and Japanese languages are the same or Hebrew and Japanese people are the same. It simply means that Hebrew and Japanese scripts came from a common origin, the ancient Egyptian script. 



The "Abrahamic Triad."

Historically, Judaism as a religion was formulated on Sefer Ha Yashar literature (Torah or “the books of the upright ones”) that was created by Solomon Bar Isaac called RASHI around 12th century A.D. However, it was Moses Ben Maimon called Maimonides who expanded on Sefer Ha Yashar literature and wrote the Pentateuch (the Old Testament) or the first five books of Moses around1168-1180 A.D – the books were later printed in 1475 A.D shortly after the invention of the printing press by the Jewish Barons.

Contrary to what we have been made to believe, Christianity was actually formulated and created before Judaism. However, the Pentateuch or the Old Testament was printed before the New Testament (i.e., Novuum Testamentum). How did this happen? In the early periods of Christianity, only the priests and church patriarchs were literate enough to interpret the scriptures, the rest of the masses were illiterates. In fact the scriptures, originally, were not meant for the masses to read and interpret.

As more people became literate and as the Christian population of the West grew, Jewish barons of Western Europe capitalized on these changes by formulating the Old Testament on the literary writings of RASHI, and subsequently distributing the printed copies to the Christian world community in Italy for profit. Be that as it may, Pope Alexander VI (1492-1503), not fully satisfied with the silence about Jesus the Christ in the printed Old Testament, instructed Desiderius Erasmus, an ex-priest and playwright to create the Synoptic Gospels (i.e., Mark, Mathew and Luke). Erasmus's New Testament (i.e., Textus Receptus or Novuum Testamentum) was originally written in Greek, but was later translated into Germanic around 1522-1534 A.D by Martin Luther, and to English around 1525-1526 A.D by William Tyndale. I must mention that the Gospel of John was not part of the original Synoptic Gospels. It was added nearly hundred years later in the King James Bible.

While most people think that Judaism precede Christianity, the proper order in the evolution of the “Abrahamic triad” was actually Dyophysitism and Monophysitism, Christianity,  Monism, Judaism, Mohammedanism and lastly Islam - the order is non-superficial. In other words, traditional Christianity evolved strictly out of Dyophysitism and was formulated and created first. Judaism evolved out of Monism and nationalism, and was created after Christianity. Traditional Islam evolved out of Monophysitism, Monism and Mohammedanism, and was created last.

Now that we know the proper order in the evolution of the “Abrahamic triad,” let us examine the scriptures in toto. The scriptures are nothing but poorly written Hollywood scripts adapted from ancient North East African and Indian (i.e., Hindu-Cush) mythologies and astrotheology. The Hindu-Cush mythologies dealt with the interaction of heavenly or celestial bodies (i.e., the sun, the moon, the star constellations and planetary movements) and the earthly bodies (i.e., Earth Chakras, Kundalini, pineal gland, liver, kidney, lingam-Yoni etc.) – as above so below.

The scriptures writers in their intent to confuse and rule over the masses anthropomorphized the mythological interactions between the aforementioned heavenly and earthly bodies. For example, the SUN was personified as the SON. The twelve zodiac signs became the twelve disciples. The three star systems pointing to the SUN at the horizon became the three kings tracking the birth of the SON, Christ. Saturn or the “Lord of the rings” became the god “El”, plural “Elohim” – plausible root of the name GabriEL, EmannuEL, angEL etc. The god “El” is a "cubegod," and is symbolically represented by a black cube. It’s probable but not implausible that the name “Israel” was derived from the Egyptian worship of the Moon Goddess (Isis), the Sun (Ra), and Saturn (El), thus IsRaEl. The Hebrew god YHWH (Yod, He, Waw, He), transliterated Yahweh or Jehovah, is known as the “Tetragramaton,” 4 letter god or the “cubegod.” This writer considers the cult of Yahweh the obvious origin of ritual circumambulation in Judaism and Islam (i.e., the ritual of circling the black cubic stone of Kaaba 7 times).



Saturn surrounded by its rings

 
Now that we have some idea of how the scriptures were formulated, let us examine the central characters in the “Abrahamic triad” (i.e., Jesus, Moses and Mohammed). Firstly, Jesus as described in the scriptures never existed. The historical Jesus the Christ was Serapis Soter (Savior) who was created and given OSIRIS like characteristics by Emperor Constantine and other dyophysite bishops at the council of Nicaea I.  Prior to that, there had been many other Christ. There was Horus (Heru) the Christ, Krishna the Christ, Jesus Ben Pandira the Christ, and Apollonius the Christ (i.e., the leader of the ultra-spiritual Essene group in Jerusalem). To be Christ simply means to be annointed. The Biblical Jesus the Christ was delibrately formulated on the combined characteristics and biographies of all the aforementioned Christ.

Secondly, Moses as described in the bible never existed. The real Moses was Moses Ben Maimon called Maimonides who expanded on Sefer Ha Yashar literature and wrote the Pentateuch (the Old Testament) or the first five books of Moses around 1168-1180 A.D. It was this historical Moses (Moses Ben Maimon) who plugged himself into the ancient Egyptian story of Amenhotep the IV (Akhenaton) - Akhenaton actually existed historically, but Moses as depicted in the Old Testament never existed. Again, it was Moses Ben Maimon called Maimonides who wrote the first five books of the Torah around 12th century A.D and it was he who plugged himself into the ancient Egyptian story of Amenhotep the IV (Akhenaton).

Lastly, Mohammed as described in the Quran never existed as a historical figure. The real or historical Mohammed was Muhyddin Muhammad Ibn Al’ Arabi, not to be confused with Abu Bakr Ibn Al-Arabi, another great Sufi-monist who died almost two decades before Muhyddin Muhammad Ibn Al’ Arabi was born. It was the biography of this great spiritual leader (i.e., Muhyddin Muhammad Ibn Al’ Arabi) that was used to create the Prophet Muhammad in traditional Islam. The traditional Islam was actually formulated and created around 1870 A.D by Jewish scholars in France (Alliance Israelite Universelle of Paris) under the instruction of the Ottoman King (Abulaziz) and other stake holders. It was the same group, Alliance Israelite Universelle of Paris, who converted the descendants of ancient monophysite Coptic Cushites (i.e., Ethiopian Falashas) and the South African Lemba people into Judaism around 19th century A.D - please research the role played by Karl Max in the conversion of Lemba people to Judaism.

In conclusion, the scriptures were written with the intent to confuse even the most discerning minds. Not a single character depicted in the scriptures of the “Abrahamic triad” ever existed as a historical figure. The “Abrahamic triad” was created in the A.D era, not in the B.C era as now believed. Furthermore, the scriptures were by and large a falsification, distortion and personification of ancient Hindu-Cush mythologies and stories. The characters created in the scriptures have no historical connection with North East Africa (i.e., Cusha Dwipa without, now called the Middle East) and ancient India (Cusha Dwipa Within). I challenge any “scriptures apologist” to provide linguistic, historical (not theology), archeological, biological, and pictorial evidence to disprove my thesis.

For further reading, check out:

http://ajendu.blogspot.com/2012/12/immaculate-deception.html

http://ajendu.blogspot.com/2013/02/soteriology.html

“Moses and monotheism” by Sigmund Freud

The “Original Torah” by David Sperling

The “Historical Origin of Christianity” by Walter Williams

The "Matrix of Power" by Jordan Maxwell

The " Natural Genesis" Vol.1 by Gerald Massey

The "Black Athena" Vol.1 by Martin Bernal

"Stolen Legacy" by G.James

Soteriology and the Historical Struggle between the Monophysites and Dyophysites

The bust of Serapis.
Serapis Soter ( a.k.a Ptolemy I Lagi ) was the first historical savior and the first historical Greek ruler of ancient Egypt.

The fights between the monophysites and dyophysites lasted for almost 1000 years, but to fully understand the nearly 1000 years of struggle between these two opposing groups and the eventual truce that led to the creation of “Abrahamic triad,” one has to study and expose the origin of soteriology.  Soteriology is simply the study of soul salvation.  In the Christian doctrine of the West, the theory of soul salvation is linked with vicarious atonement – the idea that your salvation depends on the death of Christ. However, in the Hindu-Cush mystery system of the East, the theory of soul salvation is linked with personal responsibility – that is, you’re solely responsible for your own salvation.

  

The original trinity. The divine Triad of the farther (Ausar or Osiris), the sun (Heru or Horus) and the mother godess Hathor (Isis or Auset).

In the mystery system of the ancient Egypt, Ausar (mispronounced Osiris) was the primary deity. According to the legend, Ausar was the invisible leader of the gods on earth, and the sole judge of the dead in the underworld.  He was portrayed to have a single “nature” which was divine, but not human – this would become relevant later. Before the arrival of the Greeks in ancient Egypt, the cult of Ausar was undoubtedly the biggest in the land, or perhaps the biggest in the ancient world. However, at the arrival of the Greeks in ancient Egypt, the almighty cult of Ausar would forever change. The Greek leader of conquered Egypt, Ptolemy I Lagi (a.k.a Ptolemy I Soter) replaced the cult of Ausar with the newly created cult of Serapis. Serapis’ attributes were drawn from the preexisting indigenous cult of Ausar and the less popular cult of Apis bull, which when combined formed Serapis. Ptolemy I Lagi calculated that the creation of Serapis would ease tension of Greek invasion and unify the Africans and the Greeks in the country. Alas, his calculation paid off! The people in the country were unified under the cult of Serapis, and Ptolemy I Lagi became the first historical Savior (Soter in Greek) and the central figure of the Serapis cult (i.e., Serapis Soter) – the hellenization of ancient Egypt was complete.

Ausar (i.e., Osiris). Osiris was the primary deity of ancient Egypt. In power, he was second only to his father, Ra, and was the leader of the gods on earth. He was the husband of Isis and the father of Horus.  

Ausar sitting on the great throne of  judgement in the underworld where the soul of the dead is weighed against the feather of truth or Maat.

Ptolemy I Lagi had long gone, but the cult of Serapis he created remained. The Greco reign in ancient Egypt lasted for almost 300 years until it was forcefully overthrown by the Romans. Though conquered by the Romans, the Egyptians spread their cult of Serapis and its derivatives like wild fire to Rome. It must be said that while the Romans conquered ancient Egypt militarily, the ancient Egyptians conquered Rome spiritually. When the aftershock of Serapis tsunami finally reached Rome, the indigenous pagan cult of Rome was swept into the dustbin of history. Roman elders, under Constantine, felt threatened under the invasion of a foreign cult. They quickly devised a control strategy which they found in dyophysitism. Dyophysitism is a theological doctrine that recognizes the dual nature of Christ, the divine and the human. At the council of Nicaea I, Constantine and the appointed Roman elders accepted Serapis as Christ the savior (i.e., Soter Christos), with dual nature of divine and man. Dyophysitism emerged after the council of Nicaea I, but the Coptic Egyptians who originally introduced the cult of Serapis to Rome utterly rejected dyophysitism because they only recognized the divine Osiris-like characteristics in Serapis, but could not recognize Serapis as human. These Coptic Egyptians who only recognized the divine nature of Serapis, now Christ, were known in history as Monophysites. The council of Nicaea I marked the beginning of a long struggle between the monophysites and the dyophysites.  

In spite of the disagreements between the monophysites and the dyophysites about the nature of the created Christ, Christianity developed in the Roman Empire, where it became the official religion of the Empire. However, the disagreements divided Christianity and its central authority into two distinct units. The monophysites or the heretics, as they were mostly called, occupied the Eastern end of the Holy Roman Empire (i.e., Byzantine Empire - North East Africa and Constantinople) while the dyophysites occupied the Western end of the Holy Roman Empire. After a series of council meetings among the church patriarchs to resolve the nature of Christ and over 900 years of struggle between the monophysites and the dyophysites, monophysitism somehow evolved into a new spiritual philosophy called monism. Monism, perhaps of Sufi origin, is a spiritual doctrine that promotes the existence of one Supreme Being or substance, but denies the existence of duality in god or substance. The original followers of Monism were called Mahometans or Mohammedans. It is not really clear how monophysitism was absorbed into monism, but it is very clear that the two spiritual principles are very similar. The general consensus was that the absorption of monophysitism into monism started during the crusades when the Saracen and the Seljukian Turks, who appeared to practice some form of monism, invaded and took over the monophysitic North Eastern part of the Holy Roman Empire. 

The eventual victory of the Turks over the Romans in the Eastern side of the Holy Roman Empire (i.e, Byzantine) prompted the Romans to move the seat of Christendom from the church of Hagia Sophia in Constantinople to St. Peter Basilica in the Vatican, Rome. This move marked the end of Christendom in the Eastern Holy Roman Empire and paved the way for the spread of monism or Mohammedanism – remember Mahometans or Mohammedans were followers of some form of monism. This move also marked the end of close to 1000 years of back and forth dialectics and fights between the monophysites and dyophysites. Christianity, in its dyophysitic form, became the religion of the West and Monism or Mohammedanism, in its monophysitic form, became the religion of the East.  The Turks replaced the Byzantine Holy Roma Empire of the East with the Ottoman Empire they created.

Mystic, philosopher, poet, sage, great monist, Muhammad Ibn ‘Arabi is one of the world’s great spiritual teachers. Known as Muhyiddin (the Revivifier of Religion) and the Shaykh al-Akbar (the Greatest Master), he was born in 1165 AD into the Moorish culture of Andalusian Spain, the center of an extraordinary flourishing and cross-fertilization of Jewish, Christian and Islamic thought. Scholars believe that Ibn al Arabi was the real Mohammed in the Islamic Quran.

Around 1040-1190 A.D, shortly after the fights between the monophysites and dyophysites had subsided, a Jewish baron by the name Solomon Bar Isaac called RASHI and the monophysite Knight Templars formulated Judaism based off Sefer Ha Yashar, the literature originally created by RASHI. However, it was Moses Ben Maimon called Maimonides who expanded on Sefer Ha Yashar literature and wrote the first five books of the Old Testament called the Pentateuch (i.e., the first 5 books of Moses 1168-1180 A.D). The Jewish barons of Europe, capitalizing on the spread of Christianity in the West and the invention of printing press, printed the Old Testament in 1475 A.D for the Christian community of Europe.  The Pope (Alexander VI – 1492-1503), not satisfied with the silence about Jesus the Christ in the printed Old Testament, instructed Desiderius Erasmus, an ex-priest and playwright to create the Synoptic Gospels (Mark, Matthew, and Luke), known as Novuum Testamentum or the New Testament. Almost 100 years later the fourth Gospel John was added in the King James Bible. Shortly before the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in the East (1870 A.D), a group of Jewish Scholars and Rabbi under the instruction of the monist Ottoman ruler (Abulaziz) formulated the Koran by combining the four Christian gospels and the Jewish Torah. With the formulation of the Koran, Islam was born naturally out of Mohammedanism and the creation of the Abrahamic triad (i.e., Christianity, Islam and Judaism) was complete.

The crescent moon symbol of Islam showing the horns of the moon pointing upward.

 

The mother/moon goddess Hathor (Isis or Auset) nursing the young Heru or Horus. In this image, the father (Osiris) is invicible, but his presence manifests in his young son, Heru (i.e., Babatunde). On top of Isis' head sits the sun god, Ra in between the cow horns, which symbolically represents the Crescent  moon.

The Knights Templar. These were a group of mercenaries hired by the barons of Europe to help the Byzantine christains in their fights against the monist Turks (i.e., Saracen, Seljukian and later the Ottoman) during the crusades. There were 6 crusades total. The Knights templar were initially allowed to live side by side with the monist Turks in Jerusalem, but were later kicked out. The Knights templar migrated from Jerusalem to Scotland, with the knowledge gained from the Monist Turks and the Moors, they developed  the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.


References:

 Martin Bernal: “Black Athena – vol I.” (1987)

Walter, Williams: “The Historical Origin of Islam.” (2001)

Walter, Williams: “The Historical Origin of Christianity.” (1992)

Zachary P. Gremillion: "The African Origin of Freemasonry." (2005)

Gladys M. Draycott: "Mahomet founder of Islam."  (1916)

Ojo 2/27/13.

The Metaphysics of IFA – IFA as an infinite geometric series generator.

IFA, or I Ching as it's known in the East, is formulated on the principle of harmonious duality/contrast (i.e., binary principle). The “absolute one” due to vibration and light frequency patterns manifests itself in a material world where harmonious duality/contrast is a universal reality. When a thing, anything material, is paired with its perfect antithesis, an infinite series is generated – note that any material thing that occupies space carries the marker of the “absolute one.” For example, when masculine and feminine principles are paired, an infinite series of lives is generated. Similarly, when electricity and magnetism are paired, an infinite series of sine waves is generated at a speed equals to the speed of light.

In the case of Ifa, when odd and even counts are paired, an infinite series of numbers is generated. And this infinite series of numbers is called “ODU IFA.” You can easily demonstrate this thesis by standing between two opposing mirrors. Your image in the first mirror is a perfect antithesis of your image in the second mirror, generating an infinite series of images of yourself – cool huh? We know that number 8 is the original marking of IFA divination system, which when permutated using odd and even counts generates an infinite geometric series of ODU i.e., 1/2+1/4+1/8+1/16+1/32+1/64+.....1/2^n.

The Geometric series of a bouncing ball.

Lastly, not only can the infinite geometric series of IFA system (i.e., ODU) encapsulate all actions and outcomes in the universe, it can also be tested for convergence and many other operations. My question is  If IFA is an infinite geometric series generator, can it compute or does it compute with the speed of light?

The circle represents the infinite cosmos - the never ending flow of time, where all possibilities of past, present and future are contained. The interlocking 8 symbol or double helix represents infinity or the never ending flow of electromagnetic wave. (i.e., Kundalini energy or serpent). The number 8 is a cosmic key, which is the original 8 markings of IFA divination system. This octagonal key can open a portal to any location and any time.The upper half of the circle is heaven and the lower half is earth – as above so below. The inverted pyramids further represent the truth of "as above, so below" - reflection. The sine waves on top and under the pyramids represent roaring energy flow. 

Ojo 2/15/13.

Arabic as an Afro-Asiatic Language - Myth or Reality?

Arabic-Alphabet Chart

According to the traditional language classification, Arabic is classified amongst the Afro-Asiatic language cluster. However, looking at the linguistic structure of Arabic and comparing it with the rest of the African language clusters, I'm inclined to say that no link exists between Arabic and the rest of the African language clusters. If Arabic is not an Afro-Asiatic language, so what is it? Arabic is actually a Turkic language form that was brought by the Seljukian Turks, who originally came from Turkestan, via Iran, into North and North East Africa (i.e., Middle East) around the later part of 11^th century A.D.

The dominant language of the region before the arrival of the Turks was Greek. However, Greek language was gradually replaced with Arabic as the Seljukian Turks continued to invade the Byzantine Empire - the Empire which extended over North and North East Africa at this time. While the Arabic language is Turkic in its spoken form, it is actually African in its written form. What does this mean? It means that the Arabic script is 100 percent African. When the Seljukian Turks invaded Byzantine North East Africa, they brought with them a spoken language but not a written script or any form of writing system. Thus, they had to use Arabic script to transliterate their language. It is not uncommon for a people, with no writing script of their own, to use a borrowed script to write down their language. For example, the Yoruba and Ibo people of present day Nigeria adopted Latin as a writitng script for their respective indigenous languages. 

There were three forms of writing system available in North and North East Africa at the time when the Seljukian Turks invaded, and they were all Pharaonic Egypt based – namely, Hieroglyphs, Phonetic I alphabet (i.e., Heratic), and Phonetic II alphabet (i.e., demotic). Thus, it was the Phonetic I and Phonetic II alphabets that were adapted by the Arab scholars to write down the Turkic language that they spoke, and is today called the Arabic script. The Arabic alphabet today comprises of 18 letter shapes, and thus by adding one, two, or three dots to letters with similar phonetic characters a total of 28 letters is obtained (Walter Willians, 2001).

Let’s now juxtapose Arabic and some African language clusters to fully understand the argument presented above.

For example let’s look at the word “spirit.”

In Coptic language, the word “spirit” or “soul” is bai.

In Mbochi (Congo)           it is        :     ba (to be in spirit)

Bambara (Mali)               it is        :   be (to have spirit or to exist)

Pharaonic Egypt              it is        :   ba (spirit or soul)

Arabic                              it is        :  nafs (soul, essence, or being)

Note the divergence of Arabic in the cluster.

Let’s look at the word “bad.”

In Coptic                            it is         :   bane or bani (bad)

In Wolof (Senegal)            it is         :   bon (bad)

Bambara (Mali)                 it is         :   bone (bad luck)

Pharaonic Egypt                it is         :   bin (bad)

Arabic                                it is         :   sar, sayyi (bad)

Note the divergence of Arabic in the cluster.

Let’s look at “Mother”

In Coptic                             it is        :   mau, maau, meu

In Yoruba (Nigeria)            it is         :   ma ma

In Bambara (Mali)             it is         :   ma

Pharaonic Egypt                it is         :   me.t (mother)

Arabic                                it is         :   Umm

Note the divergence of Arabic in the cluster.

Let’s examine “To love”

In Coptic                             it is         :   mere, melli, meri

In Wolof (Senegal)             it is         :   mar (to love madly)

In Luo                                 it is         :   mer (to be in accord with)

Pharaonic Egypt                it is         :   mr

Arabic                                it is         :   habba
Hebrew                              it is         :   Ahab (Love)

Note how Hebrew and Arabic converge with each other, but diverge from the rest of the African language cluster.

Lastly, let’s look at one of the rare examples where Arabic actually converges with the African language cluster.

Let’s look at “Water”

In Coptic                             it is        :   mo, mi

In Yoruba (Nigeria)            it is         :   omi

In Benin(Edo, Nigeria)       it is         :   omi

Pharaonic Egypt                it is         :   mw

Tiv (Nigeria)                      it is         :   ma

Arabic                                it is         :   ma 

 Note the convergence of Arabic with the other African languages in the cluster.

From the examples given above, and from many more examples that are not recited here, it is obvious that Arabic language diverges from the rest of the African language clusters. And thus, Arabic is not an Afro-Asiatic language. As I have shown in my last example above, in a few cases, Arabic language does converge with the African language clusters, this is due probably to borrowing and racial mixing that has occurred over the centuries. Classifying Arabic as an Afro-Asiatic or Hamito-Semitic language is a misnomer. Arabic and Hebrew are related languages and perhaps came from the same source. In my opinion, it would be more appropriate to classify them as Semitic languages, but not Afro-Asiatic. On a final note, I'm calling on young scholars, more specifically young African scholars, to desist from using the scriptures (i.e., Torah, Bible and Koran) to formulate African history. The intention of these books is to confuse you about ancient world history, especially African history. Religious texts lack historicity, and should not be used under any circumstances as history books.

Arabic, Hebrew, Syriac, Greek, and Latin placed side by side - notice the similarities. They all came from one source, Pharaonic Egyptian script i.e., Phonetic.

The Alphabet Chart
Showing the first writing system by the Egyptians: the hieroglyphic, hieratic-demotic and the phonetic. It's from the phonetic Pharaonic Egyptian alphabet that the Greek/Latin alphabets developed.

References:

Molefi, Asante: “African Intellectual Heritage – a book of sources.” (1996)

Anta, Diop: “Civilization or Barbarism.” (1991)

Martin Bernal: “Black Athena – vol I.” (1987)

Walter, Williams: “The Historical Origin of Islam.” (2001)

Walter, Williams: “The Historical Origin of Christianity.” (1992)

Ojo 2/12/13.