THE NEW CHRONOLOGY

The acceptable standard of historical methodology dictates that history has to be established based on veritable time and space. Time tells us when an event occurs while space tells us where an event occurs. Together, they form a complete coordinate system of history, in which time is tracked using different astronomical methods (solar and lunar eclipses), while space is located based on archeological and linguistic evidentiary facts.

The B.C/A.D conventional-timing-system (i.e., the Western Calendaring System) was formulated based on the astronomical manual (i.e. stellar/lunar catalog) of PTOLEMY ALMAGEST (a.k.a Ptolemy Megiste). So expectedly, the chronology of the entire history of almost all the classical civilizations, from ancient Egypt to the Ottoman Empire, follows the B.C/A.D conventional-timing-system.

However, the B.C/A.D conventional-timing-system is erroneous because the Almagest’s astronomical manual on which it’s formulated has now been found to be defective.  A brilliant Russian mathematician, Anatoly Fomenko, while calculating a certain coefficient D in the theory of lunar motion, found out that the standard Almagest’s time coordinates he relied upon in his calculation were inaccurate.

In other words, when Fomenko plugged-in standard Almagest’s time coordinates into his equation, he found that the lunar motion violated the law of universal gravitation. But when he recalibrated the Almagest’s time coordinates and plugged-in the new coordinates into his equation, the lunar motion complied as it should be with the law of universal gravitation. 

While Fomenko’s findings have already reverberated through the academic corners of the world, his findings will have profound implications for how we view the history of the world; the history of religion, and the chronology of ancient dynasties and epochs (see http://www.chronologia.org/en/struggle.html).

In view of Fomenko’s findings, Fomenko’s chronologists have now concluded the following:

1. Ptolemy Almagest astronomical manual, though mathematically sound, was compiled in 16th and 17th centuries from astronomical data of the 9th through 16th centuries and not in the 1st century as now implied in the traditional narratives.

2.  Historians and translators often "assign" different dates and locations to different accounts of the same historical events, creating multiple "phantom copies" of these events.

3. The B.C/A.D conventional or ecclesiastical chronology was largely manufactured by Joseph Justus Scaliger, and his Jesuit comrade, Dionysius Petavius, and represents a vast array of dates produced without any justification whatsoever, containing the repeating sequences of dates with shifts equal to multiples of the major cabbalistic numbers 333 and 360.

4. No single document in existence can be reliably dated earlier than the 11th century.

5. Histories of Ancient Rome, Greece and dynastic Egypt were crafted during the Renaissance by humanists and clergy - mostly on the basis of documents of their own making.

6. The history of religions runs as follows: the pre-Christian period (before the 11th century), Bacchic Christianity (11th-12th century, before and after JC), JC Christianity (12th-16th century) and its subsequent mutations into Orthodox Christianity, Catholicism, Judaism, and Islam.

7. The well-known horoscope in The Book of Revelation, dated to 25 September - 10 October 1486, was compiled by cabbalist Johannes Reuchlin.

In conclusion, Fomenko’s scientific chronology supports my view of Abrahamic religion and history in general.